US judge rejects Ghislaine Maxwell's bid to overturn sex trafficking conviction
Translated from French, summarized and contextualized by DistantNews.
At a glance
- A US federal judge rejected Ghislaine Maxwell's request to overturn her conviction for sex trafficking.
- Judge Paul Engelmayer found Maxwell's arguments that her constitutional rights were violated during her trial to be without serious merit.
- Maxwell, a key accomplice to Jeffrey Epstein, was sentenced to 20 years in prison in 2021 for her role in supplying underage girls to Epstein.
A federal judge has denied Ghislaine Maxwell's attempt to have her sex trafficking conviction overturned. U.S. District Judge Paul Engelmayer ruled that Maxwell's claims of constitutional rights violations during her trial and sentencing lacked substantial grounds.
Maxwell, who was convicted in 2021 for her role as a key accomplice to the late Jeffrey Epstein, argued that her rights were infringed upon. She was sentenced to 20 years in prison for her involvement in supplying underage girls to Epstein. She is the only person convicted of a crime directly linked to the disgraced financier, who died in his New York prison cell in 2019 while awaiting trial.
The ruling comes as theories surrounding Epstein's death continue to circulate, with many suspecting foul play to prevent revelations about prominent figures. Despite initial government claims of no new evidence emerging from Epstein's case, Congress compelled the Justice Department to release millions of pages of documents. These documents have shed light on Epstein's extensive connections within business and political circles. Maxwell, 64, has consistently denied wrongdoing, and her legal team has pursued various avenues to challenge her conviction.
the arguments raised by Robert Maxwell's daughter, that her constitutional rights had been violated, were devoid of serious foundation.
Originally published by Le Figaro in French. Translated, summarized, and contextualized by our editorial team with added local perspective. Read our editorial standards.