DistantNews
Support us
Whistleblower Doctor Testifies for Nine Hours in Warsaw Medical Malpractice Probe
๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ฑ Poland /Health & Science

Whistleblower Doctor Testifies for Nine Hours in Warsaw Medical Malpractice Probe

From Rzeczpospolita · () Polish

Translated from Polish, summarized and contextualized by DistantNews.

At a glance

News Named sources Under investigation
  • A whistleblower doctor testified for over nine hours in a Warsaw prosecutor's office investigation into alleged medical errors at a hospital.
  • The doctor's lawyer stated the case is serious and "shocking" but could not disclose details due to investigation secrecy.
  • The testimony followed a previous instance where the doctor refused to testify without legal representation.

Dr. Emil Jฤ™drzejewski, a former head of surgery at Warsaw's Southern Hospital, testified for more than nine hours on Monday at the District Prosecutor's Office in Warsaw. The investigation concerns alleged irregularities and medical errors at the hospital during the period when Dawid Kacprzyk was the coordinator of the emergency department.

I would very much like to present to the public what I learned during this interrogation, because the case is serious and shocking in places. However, I have a legal obligation to maintain investigative secrecy and professional confidentiality, so unfortunately I will not talk about the details.

โ€” Tomasz JendrasiakLawyer for Dr. Emil Jฤ™drzejewski, commenting on the significance of his client's testimony.

Dr. Jฤ™drzejewski's lawyer, Tomasz Jendrasiak, described the case as serious and "shocking in places." He stated that the prosecutor's office now possesses detailed information to proceed with further actions. However, Jendrasiak emphasized his legal obligation to maintain investigative secrecy and professional confidentiality, preventing him from revealing specific details of the testimony to the public.

The interrogation proceeded under normal conditions. It was recorded, took place in an air-conditioned room, water was provided, and short breaks were given. Everything happened according to procedures.

โ€” Tomasz JendrasiakLawyer for Dr. Emil Jฤ™drzejewski, describing the conditions of the nine-hour testimony.

The nine-hour interrogation, which was recorded and conducted under proper procedures with breaks and refreshments, differed significantly from a previous attempt. During that earlier session, Dr. Jฤ™drzejewski had refused to answer questions, asserting his right to have legal counsel present. Jendrasiak noted that his client's insistence on legal representation was a matter of principle, especially when witnessing attempts to expose irregularities being met with criticism or challenges to credibility.

I cannot remain silent when I see someone trying to expose and publicize irregularities, and facing harsh criticism or attempts to undermine their credibility, because they requested a postponement of their interrogation and consistently did not allow their right to appoint a representative to be violated.

โ€” Tomasz JendrasiakLawyer for Dr. Emil Jฤ™drzejewski, explaining his client's stance on testifying with legal counsel.

Dawid Kacprzyk, the former emergency department coordinator, is represented by lawyer Jacek Dubois. Dubois has stated that his client is a "victim of a whistleblower who is totally unreliable and who was in conflict with him." He asserted that Kacprzyk has not admitted to any wrongdoing.

fell victim to a whistleblower who is totally unreliable, who was in conflict with him.

โ€” Jacek DuboisLawyer for Dawid Kacprzyk, describing his client's perspective on the whistleblower's claims.
DistantNews Editorial

Originally published by Rzeczpospolita in Polish. Translated, summarized, and contextualized by our editorial team with added local perspective. Read our editorial standards.