DistantNews
Support us
Accident in Pedrozo: "Responsibility is personal," clarifies lawyer
๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡พ Paraguay /Crime & Justice

Accident in Pedrozo: "Responsibility is personal," clarifies lawyer

From ABC Color · () Spanish

Translated from Spanish, summarized and contextualized by DistantNews.

At a glance

News Named sources Outcome reported
  • A Paraguayan penal lawyer stated that responsibility for fatal traffic accidents, like the Pedrozo case, lies with the individual driver, not control authorities.
  • The lawyer explained that even if a vehicle with excess load caused an accident after passing a checkpoint, control authorities would only be liable for administrative failures, not the homicide.
  • He also discussed the definitive dismissal of cases following economic compensation agreements with victims' families, citing a precedent from the Sanabria Vierci case.

In the wake of tragic road accidents, such as the Pedrozo incident in Ypacaraรญ where a truck lost its brakes causing six fatalities, a Paraguayan penal lawyer has clarified the legal responsibility. Josรฉ Ignacio Gonzรกlez Macchi asserted that culpability for vehicular homicide rests solely with the individual involved in the accident.

"The responsibility is personal and affects the specific person involved in the accident, regarding the figure of culpable homicide," Gonzรกlez Macchi explained. He further elaborated that even if a vehicle carrying excess weight caused a fatal accident after passing a weight control checkpoint, the authorities overseeing that checkpoint would not bear responsibility for the accident itself.

The responsibility is personal and affects the specific person involved in the accident, regarding the figure of culpable homicide.

โ€” Josรฉ Ignacio Gonzรกlez MacchiThe penal lawyer explaining the principle of individual responsibility in fatal traffic accidents.

Instead, Gonzรกlez Macchi noted, such authorities might face administrative liability for a failure in their control duties. "Objective imputation prevents us from establishing that. If someone killed a person, the father cannot be held responsible if the son killed someone," he illustrated, emphasizing the personal nature of criminal liability.

If someone was responsible for controlling the load of that vehicle, they cannot be responsible for the improper driving of the driver who was carrying excess load and caused an accident.

โ€” Josรฉ Ignacio Gonzรกlez MacchiThe lawyer clarifying the division of responsibility between control authorities and drivers in cases of overloaded vehicles causing accidents.

He added, "If someone was responsible for controlling the load of that vehicle, they cannot be responsible for the improper driving of the driver who was carrying excess load and caused an accident." This distinction aims to isolate culpability to the direct actions leading to the fatal outcome.

The lawyer also addressed the legal implications of reaching compensation agreements with victims' families. He referred to the definitive dismissal of the Sanabria Vierci case, where an agreement was reached with some families. Gonzรกlez Macchi stated that such agreements, if properly executed, allow for definitive dismissal according to the Penal Code, providing a form of restitution for those affected when the victim cannot be brought back to life.

That agreement, if done correctly, allows for the definitive dismissal. That is a predisposition that is in the Penal Code.

โ€” Josรฉ Ignacio Gonzรกlez MacchiThe lawyer discussing the legal basis for dismissing cases after reaching compensation agreements with victims' families.
DistantNews Editorial

Originally published by ABC Color in Spanish. Translated, summarized, and contextualized by our editorial team with added local perspective. Read our editorial standards.