Ade Armando Fears JK Video Case Could Harm PSI's 2029 Election Bid

Social media activist Ade Armando has announced his resignation from the Indonesian Solidarity Party (PSI), citing the mounting legal challenges he faces as the primary reason. Armando believes that the ongoing lawsuits, stemming from his involvement with a video clip of former Vice President Jusuf Kalla, have become a significant burden that could impede PSI's electoral prospects, particularly as the party looks towards the 2029 elections.

The controversy originated from a video clip of Kalla's speech, which Armando and Permadi Arya shared on their respective social media platforms. This led to reports of alleged incitement and hate speech. A group of lawyers from Maluku, followed by numerous Islamic organizations, filed complaints, arguing that the shared video segments created public commotion and presented a distorted narrative.

“

Like people will make it difficult for PSI's next work to fight for the party in various places, approaching, not approaching, heading towards the 2029 election.

Armando acknowledged that legal battles are not new to him. However, he expressed that the current situation has escalated to a point where it unfairly impacts PSI. He indicated that the legal proceedings could indirectly involve former President Joko Widodo, adding another layer of complexity to the situation. Despite the challenges, Armando stated he is open to meeting with Jusuf Kalla to discuss the matter and potentially offer an apology.

This situation highlights the sensitive nature of public discourse in Indonesia, particularly concerning religious and political figures. The legal actions against Armando underscore the strict laws surrounding online content and the potential consequences for those perceived to be spreading misinformation or inciting hatred. PSI, while distancing itself from the specific actions of its members in reporting Kalla, now finds itself navigating the political fallout from Armando's departure.

“

There are narratives being built where there are incomplete videos presented to the public, namely fragmented videos and narratives are built that lead to incomplete perspectives or conclusions in society.