AI Governance: A Battle for Human Definition, Not Just Rules

The global governance of artificial intelligence is no longer merely about setting technical standards or legal frameworks. It has become a profound struggle over ontology – how we define being, truth, and humanity itself. Economist Prof. Waldemar Karpa argues that this debate pits two major global powers against each other: Silicon Valley and Beijing.

Karpa suggests that the choices made now will determine the very essence of human existence in an AI-driven future. The technological drive from Silicon Valley, often focused on innovation and market dominance, contrasts with Beijing's strategic, state-led approach to AI development and control. This divergence presents a critical challenge for international cooperation and the establishment of universally accepted ethical guidelines.

The core of the issue, as Karpa frames it, lies in the fundamental definitions we adopt. Will AI development prioritize efficiency and technological advancement above all else, potentially at the cost of human dignity? Or can a balance be struck that upholds human values while harnessing the power of AI? The economist emphasizes that this is not just a technical or legal question, but a philosophical one that will shape the future of society.

“

Global artificial intelligence governance is no longer just a matter of setting technical standards or legal regulations. It is a battle over ontology – about how we define being, truth, and humanity.