AI preacher goes viral in Indonesia, sparking debate on technology and faith

A figure known as "Ustadzah Hajar" has become a viral sensation on social media, particularly TikTok, where she boasts nearly a million followers and millions of video views. Her realistic appearance, complete with charming dimples and expressive eyes, coupled with her touching messages, has convinced many users that she is a genuine Islamic preacher.

“

If you don't observe closely between the lip movements and the spoken words, or the head and hand movements, many netizens think this is a real preacher.

However, the reality behind Ustadzah Hajar is far from human. An investigation by the X account "thanksfortoday" revealed that she is an AI-generated character. This revelation has sparked widespread discussion about the sophistication of artificial intelligence and its ability to create convincing, albeit artificial, religious figures.

“

AI is loved by the younger generation. However, AI remains just a tool. Artificial intelligence is not a substitute for scholars, so it cannot be used as a primary reference.

The Indonesian Ministry of Religious Affairs (Kemenag) has acknowledged the growing popularity of AI among young people but stressed that AI should only be considered a supplementary tool. They firmly stated that AI cannot replace qualified ulama (religious scholars) and should not be used as a primary source for religious matters. The ministry warns that AI-generated answers are not automatically correct and must be verified, especially when the source is a virtual character like Ustadzah Hajar, who lacks any real scholarly lineage or knowledge.

“

Every AI output must be verified first. It must be validated. It cannot be swallowed whole.

Experts explain that AI platforms operate by gathering data from the internet, which can contain inaccuracies, hoaxes, or outdated information. When this unreliable data is processed by algorithms, the output can be flawed. The case of Ustadzah Hajar demonstrates how easily people can be deceived, following content from a figure that does not truly exist. For matters of religious law, which involve complex interpretations, context, and years of scholarly experience, AI is insufficient. The ministry urges the public to consult established religious scholars and authoritative religious institutions for guidance on matters of faith and practice, particularly concerning what is permissible or forbidden.

“

The case of Ustadzah Hajar proves that people are easily deceived. Hundreds of thousands of people follow the preaching content of a figure who never even existed.