DistantNews
Support us
Are Japan-Philippines talks a maritime red line for China’s blue-water ambitions?

Are Japan-Philippines talks a maritime red line for China’s blue-water ambitions?

From South China Morning Post · () English

Summarized and contextualized by DistantNews.

At a glance

News Named sources New plan
  • Japan and the Philippines are starting formal negotiations to define their maritime boundaries, which significantly overlap with Taiwan's exclusive economic zones.
  • Experts warn these talks, part of a geopolitical strategy by US allies, could reinforce the

Japan and the Philippines have initiated formal negotiations to delimit the maritime boundaries of their exclusive economic zones (EEZs) and continental shelves. This move is strategically significant as the defined zones substantially overlap with Taiwan's territory, east of the island.

Under international law, coastal states are granted EEZ rights up to 200 nautical miles from their shores, including exclusive authority over natural resources and control over artificial installations. However, the legality of foreign military activities within these waters remains a contentious issue.

these talks – part of a highly calculated geopolitical effort by US allies – could reinforce the so-called first island chain and restrict Beijing’s naval access in an area vital to any potential conflict over Taiwan: its clear red line.

— expertsExperts warn about the geopolitical implications of the Japan-Philippines maritime talks.

Experts suggest that Beijing views these negotiations as a direct challenge to its stance on Taiwan. Ding Duo, director of the Centre for International and Regional Studies at the National Institute for South China Sea Studies, stated that a bilateral agreement extending into waters claimed by third parties holds no legal weight for excluded claimants. The talks are seen as a calculated geopolitical effort by US allies to reinforce the "first island chain" and potentially restrict China's naval access in a region crucial for any conflict over Taiwan.

a bilateral agreement extending into waters claimed by third parties carries no legal weight for excluded claimants.

— Ding DuoDing Duo, director of the Centre for International and Regional Studies at the National Institute for South China Sea Studies, explains the legal limitations of the bilateral agreement.
DistantNews Editorial

Originally published by South China Morning Post. Summarized and contextualized by our editorial team with added local perspective. Read our editorial standards.