China says UN should revisit Lebanon peacekeeping mission decision
Summarized and contextualized by DistantNews.
TLDR
- China's UN envoy, Fu Cong, stated that the UN Security Council's decision to end the mandate of the UN peacekeeping mission in Lebanon (UNIFIL) at the end of 2026 needs revisiting.
- Fu expressed concern over the ongoing conflict and the lack of a true ceasefire, calling for Israel to cease its bombardment of Lebanon.
- He indicated that the UN secretariat is considering options for the mission's future, with a review expected in June, and suggested a majority in the Security Council agrees it's not the time to redraw UNIFIL.
China, holding the rotating presidency of the UN Security Council for May, has called for a reassessment of the decision to withdraw the UN Interim Force in Lebanon (UNIFIL) at the end of 2026. Ambassador Fu Cong articulated China's concern over the volatile situation in Lebanon, emphasizing that the current state is not a genuine ceasefire but rather a "lesser fire." He directly urged Israel to halt its bombardment of Lebanese territory, highlighting the devastation in southern Lebanon since the conflict escalated in March.
It is incumbent on Israel to stop this bombardment of Lebanon.
Fu Cong's remarks underscore China's growing assertiveness in international affairs and its willingness to challenge established timelines for peacekeeping operations. The envoy's statement that "We do believe we should revisit the decision actually to withdraw the UNIFIL" signals a potential shift in the Security Council's approach. This stance is particularly significant given China's role as a permanent member of the Security Council and its increasing influence within the UN system.
The call to revisit UNIFIL's mandate comes amidst escalating cross-border hostilities between Hezbollah and Israel. While Israel maintains its actions are defensive, aimed at curbing Hezbollah's attacks, the impact on Lebanese infrastructure and civilian lives has been severe. China's position, as articulated by Fu Cong, suggests a prioritization of stability and a questioning of the current withdrawal plan, potentially advocating for a continued UN presence to manage the fragile security situation.
We do believe we should revisit the decision actually to withdraw the UNIFIL.
Ambassador Fu also indicated that discussions with UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres have taken place, and the UN secretariat is exploring options for the mission's future, with proposals expected in June. The envoy's assertion that "at least the view of the overwhelming majority of the Security Council is that this is not the time to redraw UNIFIL" suggests a consensus is forming against the current withdrawal timeline. This aligns with observations from UN peacekeeping chief Jean-Pierre Lacroix, who previously noted that some form of UN presence might persist beyond the mandate's end, reflecting a shared concern for continued engagement in the region.
I think at least the view of the overwhelming majority of the Security Council is that this is not the time to redraw UNIFIL.
Originally published by The Straits Times. Summarized and contextualized by our editorial team with added local perspective. Read our editorial standards.