Chinese Student's NTU Admission and Departure: Regulations, Not Coercion, Apply

Recent reports have sensationalized the case of a Chinese student admitted to National Taiwan University (NTU) through the "Star Plan," framing their mandatory departure upon turning 18 as being "forced" to leave. This narrative deliberately misrepresents the situation and plays into divisive political agendas. As commentators like Shih Ming-chin have rightly pointed out, this is not a matter of coercion but a straightforward application of existing regulations governing cross-strait relations.

The core issue is that the student, being a Chinese national without Taiwanese identity, is subject to immigration laws that require departure upon reaching the age of majority. This rule applies universally to any non-national student in a similar situation, irrespective of their academic achievements. The notion of being "forced" is a misleading interpretation designed to provoke sympathy or political outrage, ignoring the legal framework that governs such admissions.

“

The fact is, this student is Chinese and does not have Taiwanese identity. His period of residence has expired. If it were any non-national, they would need to leave. It has nothing to do with whether you got into NTU, and no one is forcing you. You should leave according to the regulations.

From Taiwan's perspective, the "Star Plan" is intended to provide opportunities for underprivileged or rural students within Taiwan to access higher education at prestigious institutions like NTU. Each spot taken by a foreign national, even one with strong academic credentials, represents a missed opportunity for a deserving Taiwanese student. While we welcome international students who choose Taiwan through proper academic channels, we must prioritize our own citizens' access to limited educational resources. The narrative of being "forced" to leave conveniently ignores the fact that the student is simply adhering to the established rules, rules that are in place to ensure fairness and equity within our educational system.

“

It's a pity that Taiwan has lost an opportunity for a disadvantaged or rural child to get into NTU.