Confusion Over Supplemental Income for Artists: "AMS Gives Different Information"

A wave of confusion and concern is sweeping through Austria's vibrant arts and culture scene following the implementation of new supplemental income regulations by the AMS at the start of the year. While the government's intention was to promote regular employment, artists' representatives argue that these changes are fundamentally misaligned with the precarious and often project-based reality of their work.

Groups like IG Autorinnen Autoren, the Dachverband der österreichischen Filmschaffenden, and IG Bildende Kunst, along with the IG Freie Theaterarbeit represented by managing director Ulrike Kuner, have collectively sounded the alarm. In an open letter released in late April, they presented a stark assessment: the new 'supplemental income ban' is massively deteriorating working conditions within the arts and culture sector. This is compounded by a lack of legal clarity, leaving many artists uncertain about their financial footing.

The core of the issue lies in the mismatch between the AMS regulations and the typical income streams for actors, set designers, cinematographers, and other cultural workers. Their work is often sporadic, project-dependent, and involves multiple small, short-term engagements. The new rules, designed for more conventional employment patterns, risk making it harder for these artists to sustain themselves, potentially leading to empty stages and dimmed spotlights across Austria. The call is for regulations that acknowledge and support the unique economic landscape of the creative industries.

“

Zuverdienstverbot verschlechtert die Arbeitsverhältnisse in Kunst und Kultur massiv