Court Halts AFA Case Transfer, Sending Dispute to Supreme Court

The Argentine Football Association (AFA) and its leadership, including President Claudio Tapia and Treasurer Pablo Toviggino, have faced a significant setback in their efforts to consolidate legal cases against them. The Chamber of Criminal Cassation has intervened, preventing the transfer of a key investigation into alleged financial misconduct to the Campana court, a move widely seen as a strategic maneuver by Tapia and Toviggino.

This particular case, initiated by businessman Guillermo Tofoni, centers on accusations of diverting at least US$42 million. These funds, reportedly generated from national team contracts and international business dealings, are alleged to have been channeled through offshore shell companies in Miami instead of entering the AFA's coffers. The investigation holds particular significance as it is the only one that has revealed bank records detailing these alleged diversions.

“

although there may be factual connection between the alleged diversion and the laundering, the laundering is an autonomous crime and does not automatically drag all prior offenses into federal jurisdiction.

The judicial tug-of-war over jurisdiction has been intense. While Judge Adrián González Charvay of Campana sought to consolidate the case, citing federal tax issues and the alleged inseparable nature of money laundering and the diversion of funds, the Chamber of Criminal Cassation has pushed back. In a strong ruling, Judge Ignacio Rodríguez Varela emphasized that money laundering is an autonomous crime and does not automatically drag all preceding offenses into federal jurisdiction. The court also noted the "striking" nature of the attempt to move all AFA investigations to the conurbation, especially when the association's primary operations are based in Buenos Aires City, not Pilar as argued by the defense.

This decision underscores the complex legal battles surrounding the AFA's leadership. The ruling not only thwarts Tapia and Toviggino's strategy but also highlights judicial scrutiny over their attempts to control the legal proceedings. The matter now rests with the Supreme Court, which will ultimately decide the fate of this high-stakes investigation.

“

striking was the claim to move all AFA investigations to the conurbation, when in reality it is managed in the City of Buenos Aires and not in Pilar.