Court Sentences First Lady Kim Keon-hee to 4 Years in Prison on Appeal
Translated from Korean, summarized and contextualized by DistantNews.
TLDR
- A South Korean court sentenced Kim Keon-hee, the First Lady, to four years in prison and a 50 million won fine in an appeal trial related to stock manipulation and bribery allegations.
- The court found Kim guilty of using her position for bribery and causing national division, overturning a previous acquittal on some charges.
- The ruling marks a significant development in a case that has been ongoing for seven years since allegations first surfaced during her husband's presidential nomination.
The Seoul High Court's decision to sentence First Lady Kim Keon-hee to four years in prison and a 50 million won fine in her appeal trial represents a stark repudiation of her previous acquittal on key charges. The court's strong condemnation, stating she "betrayed the public's expectations" and used her position for bribery, underscores the gravity of the allegations surrounding stock manipulation and illicit dealings.
The First Lady is a symbolic figure representing the nation, thus requiring integrity and morality no less than the President, but the defendant has betrayed the public's expectations.
This verdict, particularly the finding of guilt in the Deutsch Motors stock manipulation case, directly contradicts the first trial's assessment. The appellate court's reasoning that Kim's provision of securities accounts to Black Pearl Investment, a firm involved in stock manipulation, could be seen as a payment for artificially inflated stock prices, is a crucial shift. The court's assertion that she was aware of and participated in the market manipulation, even if she later claimed to have withdrawn from the conspiracy, highlights a perceived pattern of complicity.
The defendant used her position to engage in brokering acts of bribery, leading to a severe national division and public conflict.
Furthermore, the court's reversal on the bribery charges, specifically regarding a Chanel bag received before President Yoon Suk-yeol's inauguration, signals a stricter interpretation of influence peddling. The court found that Kim was aware of the implicit request for favors related to government cooperation for Unification Church business, thus constituting bribery. This contrasts sharply with the first trial's view that the gift was not linked to any specific quid pro quo.
The defendant's provision of securities accounts with 2 billion won to Black Pearl, which had a 40% profit-sharing agreement, cannot exclude the possibility that it was a payment for the stock price artificially created by Black Pearl.
From the perspective of many South Koreans, this trial has been a long and agonizing saga, casting a shadow over the presidency. The public's expectation of integrity from the First Lady, as the court noted, is paramount. The verdict, while potentially destabilizing politically, is seen by some as a necessary step towards accountability, regardless of the individual's status. The stark contrast between the initial leniency and this harsher sentence reflects a judiciary grappling with complex allegations and public pressure for justice.
The defendant, despite providing substantial funds and securities accounts necessary for the stock manipulation and participating in the manipulation, has consistently offered excuses without admitting guilt.
Originally published by Dong-A Ilbo in Korean. Translated, summarized, and contextualized by our editorial team with added local perspective. Read our editorial standards.