DistantNews
Disappointment and Anger at National Cemetery as 5·18 Spirit Fails to Make Constitutional Preamble

Disappointment and Anger at National Cemetery as 5·18 Spirit Fails to Make Constitutional Preamble

From Dong-A Ilbo · (2h ago) Korean Critical tone

Translated from Korean, summarized and contextualized by DistantNews.

TLDR

  • Visitors to the National 5·18 Cemetery expressed deep disappointment and anger over the failure to include the spirit of the May 18th Democratization Movement in the constitutional preamble.
  • Mourners criticized politicians for their perceived hypocrisy and broken promises regarding the constitutional amendment.
  • They voiced concerns about future generations and the potential for historical injustices to be repeated.

As the 46th anniversary of the May 18th Democratization Movement approaches, a somber mood has settled over the National 5·18 Cemetery in Gwangju. Visitors, paying their respects to the martyrs of the uprising, are not only mourning the past but also expressing profound frustration with the present political landscape. The recent failure to enshrine the spirit of the 5·18 movement in the preamble of the constitution has left many feeling betrayed and disillusioned.

This year is a particularly chilling May.

— MournerExpressing the emotional weight of the current situation surrounding the 5.18 anniversary.

This sentiment is palpable among the mourners, who have gathered to remember the sacrifices made 46 years ago. They speak of a 'chilling May' this year, a sentiment amplified by the political deadlock that derailed the constitutional amendment. The promises made by politicians, particularly from the ruling party, to include the 5·18 spirit in the constitution are now seen as hollow rhetoric, employed merely for political expediency. This perceived betrayal cuts deep, especially for those who view the movement as a foundational pillar of South Korean democracy.

Are you not ashamed to face future generations?

— Moon Ho-jinCriticizing politicians for the failure of the constitutional amendment and its implications for future generations.

Visitors are vocal in their criticism of the political establishment, accusing them of a 'two-faced attitude.' The failure to reach a consensus on the constitutional amendment is seen as a failure to honor the sacrifices of the democratization heroes and a disservice to future generations. Questions like 'Are you not ashamed to face future generations?' and 'Do you intend to impose martial law again?' reflect the deep-seated anger and concern that the lessons of history are being ignored.

If the political parties get caught up in political disputes, the current reality of it being overturned like flipping a palm is too regrettable.

— Moon Ho-jinLamenting the political maneuvering that led to the failure of the constitutional amendment.

From the perspective of those in Gwangju and those who deeply respect the 5·18 movement, this constitutional amendment was more than just a legal formality; it was a moral imperative. It represented an opportunity to solidify the nation's commitment to democratic values and to acknowledge the pivotal role the movement played in shaping modern South Korea. The fact that this opportunity was squandered due to political infighting is a source of immense disappointment and a stark reminder of the ongoing struggles to fully realize the ideals of the democratization movement. The memory of 1980, and the subsequent fight for justice, demands more than just commemoration; it demands concrete action and unwavering commitment from our leaders.

The inclusion of the spirit of May 18 in the constitution was an opportunity for the People Power Party to restore trust broken by illegal martial law.

— Choi Sang-baekCriticizing the ruling party for missing the chance to mend trust through the constitutional amendment.
DistantNews Editorial

Originally published by Dong-A Ilbo in Korean. Translated, summarized, and contextualized by our editorial team with added local perspective. Read our editorial standards.