Discontent Over Prize Money at Roland Garros 2026
Translated from Vietnamese, summarized and contextualized by DistantNews.
TLDR
- Tennis players are dissatisfied with the prize money increase at Roland Garros 2026, deeming it too modest compared to other Grand Slams.
- Despite a 9.53% overall prize money increase, players argue their share of the tournament's revenue has decreased.
- Players are demanding a larger share of Grand Slam revenues, improved welfare benefits, and a greater say in scheduling.
Roland Garros, one of the most prestigious events in the tennis calendar, is once again at the center of a dispute over prize money. While organizers announced a 9.53% increase in the total prize fund for 2026, with singles champions set to receive 2.8 million euros, this figure has been met with considerable disappointment by the players.
The athletes argue that this increase is significantly lower than the 20% hike seen at the US Open and represents a shrinking percentage of the tournament's overall revenue. According to a statement released by the players, Roland Garros generated 395 million euros in revenue in 2025, a 14% increase from the previous year. However, the prize money distribution has fallen to 14.3% of this revenue, far below the 22% requested by players from Grand Slam tournaments.
Roland Garros has generated revenue of 395 million euros in 2025, an increase of 14% compared to the previous year. However, the small increase in prize money has led to a decrease in the percentage of revenue that players receive, down to 14.3%.
This ongoing conflict highlights a broader tension within professional tennis. While other sports are modernizing their governance and adapting to changing stakeholder needs, the Grand Slams appear resistant to change. Players have been in discussions with all four Grand Slams for over a year, feeling that their contributions to the growing revenues are not being adequately recognized. The call for a larger share of prize money, coupled with demands for better welfare and pension schemes and a more significant voice in scheduling decisions, underscores the players' push for greater equity and influence within the sport.
While other sports are modernizing governance, adjusting stakeholders, and building long-term value, Grand Slams continue to resist change.
Originally published by Tuแปi Trแบป in Vietnamese. Translated, summarized, and contextualized by our editorial team with added local perspective. Read our editorial standards.