DistantNews
Support us
๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ฉ Indonesia /Crime & Justice

DPR confirms Haji and Umrah Law does not criminalize independent pilgrims

From Republika · () Indonesian

Translated from Indonesian, summarized and contextualized by DistantNews.

At a glance

News Named sources In the courts
  • The Indonesian House of Representatives (DPR) clarified that the Haji and Umrah Law does not criminalize individuals performing umrah independently.
  • The DPR stated that criminal provisions in the law target illegal Umrah travel organizers, not individuals assisting family or friends.
  • The law aims to deter illegal organizers and protect citizens, with provisions also acknowledging independent umrah travel in response to Saudi Arabia's policy changes.

The Indonesian House of Representatives (DPR) has asserted that Law Number 8 of 2019 concerning the Organization of Hajj and Umrah (UU PIHU) is not intended to criminalize individuals who undertake the umrah pilgrimage independently. This clarification was made during a judicial review hearing at the Constitutional Court (MK).

Abdullah, the DPR's legal representative, explained that the criminal provisions within the UU PIHU are specifically aimed at entities acting as Umrah Travel Organizers (PPIU) without official permits. He emphasized that these articles do not apply to individuals who merely invite, coordinate, or accompany family and relatives on their religious journey. "Conversely, the article in question is not intended to criminalize independent umrah pilgrims who invite, coordinate, or accompany family and relatives on their pilgrimage," Abdullah stated.

The DPR views the criminal provisions, particularly Article 112 of the UU PIHU, as a crucial legal instrument to deter illegal umrah organizers and ensure accountability in the organization of the pilgrimage. This measure is designed to protect Indonesian citizens. Furthermore, the DPR argued that Articles 115 and 122 of the UU PIHU do not contradict the 1945 Constitution's guarantees of freedom of worship. Instead, they represent the state's responsibility to provide protection to its citizens undertaking religious journeys, as mandated by the constitution.

Additionally, the DPR highlighted that the law's recognition of independent umrah travel in Article 86, paragraph (1), letter b, actually strengthens the guarantee of freedom of worship. This provision is also a response to evolving policies from the Saudi Arabian government. During the hearing, Constitutional Court Justice Enny Nurbaningsih requested the DPR to submit academic papers and discussion minutes related to amendments to the UU PIHU, seeking further details on the shift from "individual" to "independent" umrah and the definition of service providers required for independent umrah.

DistantNews Editorial

Originally published by Republika in Indonesian. Translated, summarized, and contextualized by our editorial team with added local perspective. Read our editorial standards.