Ex-Kirchner Official López Seeks to Reframe Testimony in 'Notebooks' Trial

The 'Notebooks' corruption trial continues to be a central focus in Argentina, and the latest hearing saw former Public Works Secretary José López attempt a strategic maneuver. López, a figure deeply entrenched in the Kirchner era's public works projects, has a history of shifting his legal stance. Previously, he appeared as a cooperating witness, detailing a supposed system of kickbacks. However, in this latest appearance, he adopted a more defensive posture, reading from a prepared statement to assert his innocence and that of former President Cristina Kirchner, while trying to avoid jeopardizing his status as a cooperating defendant.

“

actuó siempre dentro de los parámetros de la política

López's testimony is particularly significant given his long association with the Kirchners, dating back to their time in Santa Cruz. He was a powerful figure in public works from 2004 to 2015, serving under Planning Minister Julio De Vido. His career trajectory, alongside figures like Carlos Zannini, places him among a select group of officials who served throughout all three Kirchner presidencies. However, his public image was irrevocably tarnished in 2016 when he was caught attempting to hide nearly $9 million in cash, high-end watches, and a semi-automatic rifle at a convent just months after leaving office. This incident, famously described by Cristina Kirchner as something that made her 'hate' him, occurred while he was a Mercosur congressman and before his first significant legal pivot.

“

si se cruzan o no algunos límites

The 'Notebooks' case itself revolves around a series of notebooks allegedly kept by a driver, detailing a system of bribes paid by construction companies to government officials. López's decision to become a cooperating witness, or 'repentido,' was a pivotal moment, offering prosecutors insights into the alleged corruption network. His current attempt to moderate his testimony, emphasizing his actions were within the 'parameters of politics' and questioning where 'limits' are crossed, suggests a complex legal strategy aimed at mitigating his own sentence while potentially protecting former allies. This ongoing trial continues to expose the intricate web of power and alleged corruption from a significant period in Argentine political history.

“

Lo odié