Finland Risks 'Science Nihilism' as Disregard for Research Grows

A concerning trend of disregarding scientific evidence is deeply embedding itself within Finland's political decision-making processes, raising fears that it could morph into outright hostility towards science. This phenomenon poses a significant threat to evidence-based policy and societal progress.

“

This shows either ignorance or disregard for researched information. Both are worrying.

A striking example is the approach to managing African swine fever. Minister Sari Essayah (Christian Democrats) advocates for building fences as an effective disease control measure. However, this stance contradicts a 2018 study commissioned by her own ministry, which emphasized that fencing alone cannot prevent the spread of the disease carried by wild boars. This discrepancy points to either ignorance of, or a deliberate disregard for, established research findings, both of which are deeply troubling.

It is crucial for ministries to ensure that decision-makers are consistently informed about the best available scientific knowledge. Furthermore, decision-makers themselves must possess the capacity to act rationally based on this information, even when it conflicts with their pre-existing biases, assumptions, or values. The transition from unintentionally overlooking research to intentionally disregarding it is a small step, but one with significant consequences.

“

From unintentionally ignoring research, it is only a small step to intentional disregard. From that, it is only a small jump to contempt for research.

The author, Jari Lyytimäki, a docent in environmental protection science, warns that this disregard can easily escalate into outright contempt for scientific findings. He asserts that Finland cannot afford such a trajectory. The casual dismissal of academics ('dosents') and politically motivated interference with scientific freedom, including the harassment of researchers, are becoming realities even in Finland. Lyytimäki urges top politicians to set an example by demonstrating genuine respect for research through their decisions.

“

Casual talk about all sorts of docents, politically motivated interference with the freedom of science, and even harassment of researchers are a reality in Finland too.