DistantNews
๐Ÿ‡ฐ๐Ÿ‡ท South Korea /Elections & Politics

Gangdong-gu Electoral District Population Disparity 3.2 Times: Violates 'Equal Election' Standard

From Hankyoreh · (4m ago) Korean Critical tone

Translated from Korean, summarized and contextualized by DistantNews.

TLDR

  • The electoral district population disparity in Seoul's Gangdong-gu violates South Korea's Constitutional Court's 'equal election' standards.
  • The current district setup, based on a revised Public Official Election Act, creates a significant imbalance, with one district representing 3.17 times more people than another.
  • Critics argue that the National Assembly rushed the legislation without adequate review, potentially disenfranchising voters and hindering fair representation.

A critical issue has emerged regarding electoral district boundaries in Seoul's Gangdong-gu, with the proposed setup for the upcoming June 1 local elections falling short of the Constitutional Court's 'equal election' standards. The discrepancy in population representation between electoral districts is stark, raising serious concerns about voter equality and fairness.

The current plan, established under the revised Public Official Election Act just weeks before the election, has drawn sharp criticism for its hasty implementation. The Constitutional Court previously ruled that population disparities exceeding a 3:1 ratio between the largest and smallest districts violate the principle of equal voting rights. In Gangdong-gu, the 'Ma' electoral district (Cheonho 2-dong) represents only 11,675 residents, falling below the permissible lower limit, while the 'Da' electoral district (Gangil-dong, Sangil 2-dong, Godeok 2-dong) represents 37,016 residents, exceeding the upper limit and creating a 3.17-fold difference.

The National Assembly, failing to meet the deadline for electoral district demarcation 180 days before the local elections, discussed districts based solely on partisan advantage, resulting in a comical situation where even the Constitutional Court's standards were not met.

โ€” Kim Jun-woo, lawyer from Lawyers for a Democratic SocietyCriticizing the rushed and politically motivated process of redrawing electoral districts.

This imbalance is largely attributed to the expansion of multi-member constituencies, a measure intended to increase political participation. However, the adjustment of district boundaries without proper consideration for the increased number of representatives has led to this problematic outcome. Legal experts and civic groups, such as the Lawyers for a Democratic Society, condemn the National Assembly's rushed legislative process, arguing that it prioritizes political expediency over constitutional principles. The lack of adequate time for candidates, especially from smaller parties, to prepare for the elections further exacerbates the situation, undermining the very democratic ideals the changes were meant to promote.

Changing a two-member district to a three- or four-member district is desirable (as it can expand political participation for minority parties), but when decided only about 40 days before the election, minority parties lack even the time to register candidates.

โ€” Kim Jun-woo, lawyer from Lawyers for a Democratic SocietyExplaining the negative consequences of the late redrawing of electoral districts for smaller parties.
DistantNews Editorial

Originally published by Hankyoreh in Korean. Translated, summarized, and contextualized by our editorial team with added local perspective. Read our editorial standards.