DistantNews
Support us
๐Ÿ‡ซ๐Ÿ‡ฎ Finland /Crime & Justice

Helsinki tenant ordered to pay thousands for Airbnb subletting

From Helsingin Sanomat · () Finnish

Translated from Finnish, summarized and contextualized by DistantNews.

At a glance

News Sources not specified Outcome reported
  • A man who rented out his Helsinki apartment on Airbnb was ordered by a court to pay thousands of euros in compensation to the housing provider Heka.
  • The tenant claimed the apartment was in poor condition and sought rent reductions, but Heka initiated eviction proceedings after discovering the Airbnb subletting.
  • The court ruled against the tenant, finding that short-term rentals were prohibited and the claimed defects did not justify rent reduction or eviction termination.

A Helsinki tenant's attempt to sublet his city-provided apartment on Airbnb has backfired, resulting in a court order to pay thousands of euros in damages to the housing provider, Heka. The tenant had initially complained about the apartment's poor condition, citing issues like faulty heating, drafty doors, and signs of mold, which he argued justified a 30% rent reduction.

However, Heka discovered the tenant was using the Maunula apartment for short-term Airbnb rentals, a practice explicitly forbidden by the contract. While subletting was permitted under certain conditions, the tenant had not followed the proper procedures, including notifying Heka about any subtenants. Evidence suggested the apartment was used by up to five people simultaneously, with the tenant not always present.

The tenant claimed the apartment was in poor condition and sought rent reductions, but Heka initiated eviction proceedings after discovering the Airbnb subletting.

โ€” Article SummarySummary of the case

Heka issued a warning and notice of eviction, which the tenant contested, taking Heka to court. He cited his personal circumstances, including health issues and past debts, as reasons why the eviction would be unreasonable. He also claimed Heka's website indicated subletting was allowed. The court, however, sided with Heka, ruling that the short-term rental was a clear breach of contract and that the tenant's alleged apartment defects were insufficient grounds for rent reduction or to invalidate the eviction.

The court ruled against the tenant, finding that short-term rentals were prohibited and the claimed defects did not justify rent reduction or eviction termination.

โ€” Article SummaryOutcome of the court case
DistantNews Editorial

Originally published by Helsingin Sanomat in Finnish. Translated, summarized, and contextualized by our editorial team with added local perspective. Read our editorial standards.