DistantNews
🇳🇬 Nigeria /Elections & Politics

Insecurity didn’t start with Tinubu, group defends president’s security record

From The Punch · (36m ago) English

Summarized and contextualized by DistantNews.

TLDR

  • A political group, Renewed Hope Grassroots Initiatives, defended President Bola Tinubu's security record, stating insecurity predates his administration.
  • The group argued that changes to the security and intelligence framework require time to yield results.
  • They also opposed proposals for a single four-year presidential term, citing concerns about political balance and the need for Tinubu to complete his tenure.

The Renewed Hope Grassroots Initiatives has stepped forward to staunchly defend President Bola Tinubu's administration, particularly concerning the persistent issue of insecurity. In a press conference held in Abuja, the group's Director-General, Jaafaru Sa’ad, articulated a clear defense, asserting that the current security challenges are not a creation of the Tinubu administration but rather a deeply inherited problem.

Insecurity did not start with President Bola Tinubu. He inherited it from the four past Presidents, and he is dealing with it. Trying to blame President Tinubu for the security challenges is disingenuous.

— Jaafaru Sa’adDefending President Tinubu's record on insecurity.

Sa'ad's argument is that blaming President Tinubu for insecurity is disingenuous, given that he inherited the issue from four previous administrations. He stressed that the ongoing efforts to redesign Nigeria's intelligence and security architecture are complex and will inevitably take time to manifest visible improvements. This perspective highlights a common sentiment in Nigeria: that significant national problems require sustained, long-term solutions rather than quick fixes.

The President is redesigning the intelligence and security architecture he inherited, and these things do not materialise overnight.

— Jaafaru Sa’adExplaining the time needed for security reforms to take effect.

Beyond security, the group also addressed the contentious debate surrounding presidential term limits. While acknowledging the arguments for a single four-year term, often championed by figures like Peter Obi, the Renewed Hope Grassroots Initiatives cautioned against such a move. They contend that a single term could disrupt Nigeria's informal power rotation arrangements, which are seen by many as crucial for maintaining national unity and equity. The argument is that eight years allows for a more comprehensive implementation of policies and a better understanding of governance complexities.

In the spirit of equity, fairness and national unity, it becomes just and equitable for President Tinubu to be allowed the chance to complete his eight-year tenure.

— Jaafaru Sa’adArguing for President Tinubu to complete his full eight-year term.

From a Nigerian perspective, this defense of the president and the pushback against a single-term presidency are significant. It reflects a desire for stability and continuity, especially when facing deep-seated challenges. While international coverage might focus on the political debates, the local emphasis is on the practicalities of governance and the delicate balance of power that underpins the nation's unity. The group's defense underscores a belief that President Tinubu is on the right track and deserves the opportunity to see his reforms through.

A single term of four years does not grant enough time to effect any substantive change and is capable of truncating the peaceful rotational presidency we have enjoyed.

— Jaafaru Sa’adWarning against a single four-year presidential term.
DistantNews Editorial

Originally published by The Punch. Summarized and contextualized by our editorial team with added local perspective. Read our editorial standards.

More Stories

From Our Blog