DistantNews
Support us
Iran: 53 civilians killed in U.S. attacks in under a month
๐Ÿ‡ฐ๐Ÿ‡ท South Korea /Conflict & Security

Iran: 53 civilians killed in U.S. attacks in under a month

From Dong-A Ilbo · () Korean

Translated from Korean, summarized and contextualized by DistantNews.

At a glance

News Named sources Ongoing story
  • Iran claims 53 civilians died and 592 were injured during limited U.S. attacks that began late last month.
  • The U.S. insists it adheres to international agreements and does not attack civilians during wartime.
  • Tensions escalated after Iran attacked merchant ships attempting to cross the Strait of Hormuz via a southern route.

Iran reported that 53 civilians were killed and 592 injured during limited U.S. military strikes that commenced late last month, according to foreign media citing an Iranian health ministry official. These attacks occurred within a period of less than a month, ending July 22.

Following an initial 40-day war, the U.S. and Iran agreed to a ceasefire on April 8. They subsequently signed a 14-point memorandum of understanding for peace on June 17. A meeting between the U.S. Vice President and the Speaker of the Iranian Parliament in Switzerland four days later concluded without breakthroughs, similar to a prior meeting in Pakistan.

While working-level talks were expected to continue, Iran's actions on June 25 and 26 saw merchant ships attacked as they attempted to navigate the Strait of Hormuz via a southern route, not the designated route within Iranian territorial waters. In response, the U.S. attacked Iranian coastal targets on June 27.

The U.S. maintains that it respects international agreements, particularly regarding the non-attack of civilians during wartime, and asserts it has upheld this principle. However, Iran disputes this, claiming that U.S. forces attacked coastal areas late at night on July 23.

DistantNews Editorial

Originally published by Dong-A Ilbo in Korean. Translated, summarized, and contextualized by our editorial team with added local perspective. Read our editorial standards.