Journalist Orhan Bursalı Discusses Enduring Relevance of Nation-State

In a compelling discussion hosted at Berlin's Hür University, journalist Orhan Bursalı articulated the persistent relevance of the nation-state in contemporary global politics. Drawing from his extensive experience and frequent commentary in the 'Science and Politics' section, Bursalı emphasized that the concept of the nation-state, which saw a rise in the 20th century, remains a crucial framework for understanding international relations today. His insights resonated deeply with an audience keen to dissect the complexities of global power dynamics.

“

As he frequently emphasizes in his Science and Politics column, the issue of the nation-state, whose numbers have been increasing in the 20th century for Turkey and the world, continues to maintain its importance.

Bursalı highlighted that the significance of nation-states is not diminished even within supranational entities like the European Union. He posited that multinational corporations, often perceived as borderless, are in fact deeply anchored to their 'homelands' – the territories where they generate their profits and potential. This perspective challenges the notion of a purely globalized, deterritorialized economy, suggesting that national interests and structures continue to play a vital role in corporate strategy and global economic flows.

“

He pointed out that nation-states continue to exist within the EU.

Furthermore, Bursalı did not shy away from critiquing prevailing academic and political discourse. He took aim at those who seek to question or dismantle the very concept of the nation-state, as well as the discourse surrounding imperialism. His stance underscores a belief in the enduring power and necessity of national sovereignty and identity in a world still largely organized along state lines. The discussion served as a potent reminder that despite globalization's advances, the nation-state remains a fundamental unit of analysis and a powerful actor on the world stage.

“

He criticized those who question the existence of nation-states, and even imperialism.