Julieta Poggio's forceful response after criticism for her aesthetic retouching

Julieta Poggio, a prominent figure in Argentine entertainment, has publicly addressed the intense scrutiny she faced following the Martín Fierro de la Moda awards ceremony. The influencer, known for her presence on social media, took to TikTok to confront critics who targeted her aesthetic choices, specifically her dental veneers. Poggio articulated that her decision to undergo the reversible cosmetic procedure stemmed from the pressures of working with her image and the constant self-examination that comes with being in the public eye.

“

If I showed myself distressed publicly, it was to expose how being a hater is normalized today.

She candidly admitted to experiencing insecurities, a sentiment she believes is amplified when striving for a perceived standard of "perfect" beauty. Poggio asserted her right to make choices about her own appearance, stating, "I am a person with free will and can do whatever I want with my own face." This personal reflection underscores a broader conversation about body image and the pressures faced by public figures.

“

I decided to try a reversible aesthetic procedure because I felt like it, because I work with my image and I am a person who is constantly being seen on camera.

Poggio clarified that her subsequent removal of the dental veneers was not a direct response to the criticism but rather a personal decision based on her comfort level with the aesthetic. She questioned the public's intense focus on her personal choices, asking, "Where is the news? Where is the problem? Who am I hurting with this situation for it to go so viral?" This sentiment highlights a frustration with the disproportionate attention given to minor personal decisions.

“

And yes, it may be that in this case I tried to achieve a certain 'perfect' standard of beauty. I am a person with free will and can do whatever I want with my own face.

Beyond her personal experience, Poggio used the platform to address the normalization of online "hate." She expressed concern that if her situation, which had a reversible solution, caused distress, the psychological impact on individuals with less easily modifiable concerns could be far more severe. Her message, ending with her signature "Fuera malas vibras" (No bad vibes), aimed to turn a negative experience into a broader commentary on online behavior and its consequences.

“

If I showed myself distressed and vulnerable publicly regarding this issue, it was also to expose how being a hater is normalized today.