K-Arts relocation bill sparks backlash from arts community
Translated from Korean, summarized and contextualized by DistantNews.
TLDR
- Eleven Democratic Party lawmakers proposed a bill to relocate Korea National University of Arts (K-Arts) to Gwangju, sparking widespread opposition.
- K-Arts students, faculty, and cultural figures argue the relocation is politically motivated for the upcoming local elections and would weaken artistic education.
- The Ministry of Culture, Sports and Tourism stated it has not reviewed the relocation to Gwangju, while K-Arts prefers consolidation within Seoul.
A legislative proposal to move the prestigious Korea National University of Arts (K-Arts) to Gwangju has ignited a firestorm of protest, not just from within the university but also from the broader cultural sector. Eleven lawmakers from the Democratic Party have introduced a bill to relocate K-Arts, a move that critics argue is a thinly veiled attempt to curry favor for the upcoming June 3 local elections rather than a genuine effort to foster artistic development.
The relocation discussion, which does not consider the specificity of arts education, will weaken the competitiveness of arts education.
K-Arts students and faculty have vehemently opposed the bill. The student council issued a strong statement against the proposal, and the university itself released its own statement emphasizing that such a relocation, disregarding the unique nature of arts education, would inevitably weaken its competitive edge. They also questioned the inclusion of provisions for graduate programs in arts degrees, viewing it as a tactic to obscure the bill's true, politically driven agenda.
Bringing one school to revitalize the cultural ecosystem is short-sighted and outdated. It's good for politicians to show off before an election, but it's irresponsible.
Cultural critics have also weighed in, with some like Seo Jeong-min calling the idea of relocating K-Arts to boost Gwangju's cultural ecosystem "short-sighted and outdated." Choi Yeo-jeong, a theater critic, echoed these sentiments, stating on Facebook that the primary motivation behind the bill appears to be the launch of the integrated Gwangju-Jeonnam province, aligning with regional political agendas rather than the university's actual needs. This sentiment is shared by many in the cultural sphere, who see the proposal as a populist move with little regard for the long-term consequences.
The primary motivation for this bill is not a proposal for the school's development, but the regional political agenda tailored to the launch of the integrated Gwangju-Jeonnam province.
The issue of K-Arts' relocation is not new, having been a recurring topic, especially during election cycles. The need for a new campus arose after the adjacent area, M-dong, became a UNESCO World Heritage site in 2009. However, the university's own research, conducted in 2021, indicated a strong preference (80.3%) among its constituents for a relocation within Seoul, citing the importance of existing cultural infrastructure. The Ministry of Culture, Sports and Tourism, which oversees K-Arts, has remained non-committal, stating it has not reviewed the Gwangju relocation proposal. This stance, coupled with the university's preference for a Seoul-based consolidation, further fuels the perception that the Gwangju relocation bill is a politically motivated maneuver, lacking substantive support from either the institution or its community.
K-Arts has no plans to relocate to Gwangju.
Originally published by Hankyoreh in Korean. Translated, summarized, and contextualized by our editorial team with added local perspective. Read our editorial standards.