Liberty Times Opinion: Why Xu Lianjing Refused the NT$10,000 Cash Handout

The recent legislative push for a NT$10,000 cash handout, spearheaded by opposition parties, has ignited a fierce debate regarding its constitutional legitimacy and potential ramifications for Taiwan's governance. This publication, Liberty Times, has consistently championed democratic principles and the rule of law, and this policy raises serious concerns.

“

The 'universal cash handout of NT$10,000' was initiated by opposition legislators, not proactively budgeted by the Executive Yuan. What is unconstitutional if this is not?

At the heart of the issue lies Article 70 of the Constitution, which stipulates that the Legislative Yuan cannot propose increased expenditures. The current proposal, originating from legislators rather than the executive branch, appears to directly contravene this fundamental principle. This not only challenges the separation of powers but also sets a dangerous precedent where legislative majority could unilaterally dictate budgetary matters, potentially leading to unchecked fiscal irresponsibility.

“

According to Article 70 of the Constitution, 'The Legislative Yuan shall not propose increased expenditures.' The current 'universal cash handout of NT$10,000' was initiated by opposition legislators, not proactively budgeted by the Executive Yuan. Is this not only an unconstitutional increase in expenditure?

Furthermore, the article touches upon a deeply unsettling undercurrent: the potential for this political maneuvering to exacerbate Taiwan's vulnerability to external threats. The author's stark warning about accelerating unification with Communist China, should such constitutional disregard persist, is a sobering reminder of the precarious geopolitical landscape. The act of accepting a handout, while seemingly innocuous, is framed as potentially overlooking the grave implications for national sovereignty and future generations.

“

This can be called the greatest constitutional disaster in the history of the Republic of China's constitutional government. If a solution cannot be studied and resolved soon, a family without adults (the Constitutional Court is paralyzed) will soon fall apart. How can we face our descendants if we are unified by the totalitarian Chinese Communist Party?

This perspective is not merely academic; it reflects a deep-seated concern among many citizens about the integrity of Taiwan's democratic institutions and its long-term security. The author's personal decision to refuse the handout, and to donate it if forcibly deposited, is a principled stand against what is perceived as a politically motivated act that undermines constitutional order and potentially jeopardizes national interests. It is a call for vigilance and a reminder that the pursuit of short-term benefits should not come at the expense of constitutional principles and national security.

“

Therefore, based on the principle of separation of powers, I decided at the time not to accept it.