DistantNews
Support us
Lithuania: 80% of children's day centers face funding crisis
๐Ÿ‡ฑ๐Ÿ‡น Lithuania /Culture & Society

Lithuania: 80% of children's day centers face funding crisis

From Delfi · () Lithuanian

Translated from Lithuanian, summarized and contextualized by DistantNews.

At a glance

News Named sources Context piece
  • 80% of Lithuanian children's day centers face funding shortages, with some forced to close or reduce services.
  • The average state funding for a day center with 25 accredited places is โ‚ฌ20,100 annually, insufficient for comprehensive care.
  • The temporary minister promises to find the promised โ‚ฌ800,000 for day centers, though disputes whether closures are due to funding or lack of children.

A significant majority of children's day centers in Lithuania are struggling with inadequate funding, with a recent survey revealing that 80% face financial shortages. This situation has led to the closure of some centers, even those providing quality services, according to Eglฤ— Valatkeviฤienฤ— from "SOS vaikลณ kaimai" (SOS Children's Villages).

One such risk factor and fact, what can happen, is that day centers will close. And there are certainly such ones now, and it is a pity that among them are those that provided quality services.

โ€” Eglฤ— Valatkeviฤienฤ—Representative from "SOS vaikลณ kaimai" describing the impact of funding shortages on day centers.

The average annual state funding for a day center with 25 accredited spots amounts to โ‚ฌ20,100. Representatives from Vilnius SOS Children's Village express concern that without additional state budget funds, the services offered by these centers may eventually only meet basic children's needs. Valatkeviฤienฤ— emphasized that while legally mandated quality standards are important, adequate and proportional funding is essential for these services, which are closely integrated with children's lives and can provide significant societal value.

If we take an average day center, which has 25 accredited places, the state funding is 20.1 thousand euros per year.

โ€” Eglฤ— Valatkeviฤienฤ—Representative from "SOS vaikลณ kaimai" detailing the current state funding levels.

The survey, conducted by poverty reduction organizations among 325 day centers across 58 municipalities, found that only about one-fifth of centers believe state and municipal funding is sufficient. Nearly half reported that funding covers only essential expenses, while over 22% constantly face funding deficits. More than 8% indicated they could not operate without additional funds or donations.

The service is very 'close' to the child, so its content must not only be legally enshrined and through quality requirements, (...) but also adequate, proportional funding should be provided alongside it.

โ€” Eglฤ— Valatkeviฤienฤ—Representative from "SOS vaikลณ kaimai" emphasizing the need for adequate funding to ensure service quality.

In response to the survey results, MP Daiva Ulbinaitฤ— questioned the temporary minister, J. Zailskienฤ—, about the promised โ‚ฌ800,000 for the development and maintenance of these centers. Ulbinaitฤ— noted that centers are closing or laying off staff, questioning if the promised funding would remain a mere "paper point." Minister Zailskienฤ—, however, stated that the promised funds would be secured. She also suggested that some centers might be closing not due to a lack of funding, but a shortage of children, urging for specific cases to be provided if this is the primary issue.

You, minister, promised in January this year to find at least 800,000 euros at least for the existence of these children's day centers. But children's day centers are sounding the alarm bells again today, and indeed 8 out of 10 face funding problems. And they are either closing or laying off staff.

โ€” Daiva Ulbinaitฤ—Member of the Seimas (Parliament) questioning the temporary minister about promised funding.
DistantNews Editorial

Originally published by Delfi in Lithuanian. Translated, summarized, and contextualized by our editorial team with added local perspective. Read our editorial standards.