Lithuanian Center Questions State's Role in Preventable Murder

A recent murder in Avižieniai has prompted the Center for Equality Development to question whether state institutions took all necessary measures to prevent the tragedy. The center argues that beyond the details of the crime itself, the crucial focus should be on understanding the underlying reasons and exploring whether the violence could have been averted.

“

Not just how the murder happened, but why.

"It's important to understand not just how the murder happened, but why," stated the center. While acknowledging that details like the method of entry or the weapon used are significant, the organization stresses that these do not answer the most critical questions about the victim's death and the potential for prevention.

The Center for Equality Development points out that the international human rights and academic communities have long analyzed such crimes as "femicides" – the killing of a woman because of her gender. This concept, they argue, allows for the examination of recurring risk factors, the circumstances under which women are most often murdered, and the development of more effective prevention measures.

“

These are important facts, but they do not answer the most important questions – why this woman was murdered and whether it could have been prevented.

"In this case, it has been publicly stated that a restraining order against the suspect was already in place. This once again reminds us that fatal violence against women is often not unexpected – previous episodes of violence and coercive control are frequently documented beforehand," the center noted. They emphasize that when violence is known prior to a murder, it is essential to evaluate not only the crime itself but also the effectiveness of the risk identification and protection systems.

“

In this case, it has been publicly stated that a restraining order against the suspect was already in place. This once again reminds us that fatal violence against women is often not unexpected – previous episodes of violence and coercive control are frequently documented beforehand.

Jūratė Juškaitė, director of the Lithuanian Center for Human Rights, reacted to the tragedy, calling it "another murder that could have been avoided." She highlighted that the victim had called the police, but authorities were unable to save her. Juškaitė noted that such crimes are recurrent in Lithuania, with approximately twenty occurring annually within domestic settings. She questioned the societal normalization of these killings and the lack of public political response or concrete proposals for change.

“

Another murder that could have been avoided. The woman was murdered by her former partner, who had a restraining order against him. The woman called the police, but the services failed to save her.