Magyar Violates The Constitution

Hungary's fundamental law has been directly challenged by Peter Magyar's recent actions. As legal expert Bela Pokol, a former judge of the Constitutional Court, has articulated, Magyar's public demand for the president's resignation constitutes a clear violation of the constitution. This is not a minor procedural misstep; it strikes at the heart of the legal framework governing our nation.

Pokol's analysis, grounded in Article 13(2) of the Fundamental Law, clarifies the proper constitutional procedure for addressing such matters. A prime minister or prime minister-designate can initiate impeachment proceedings, but this must occur within the parliamentary arena, be supported by stated reasons, and adhere to a rigorous legal process culminating in a Constitutional Court decision. Magyar's circumvention of these established rules, by making his demand publicly and outside of parliament, is therefore a serious constitutional transgression.

“

The head of state may be legitimately criticized — even publicly, with stated reasons — by the prime minister or, after an election, by the prospective prime minister, but calling on him to resign in the course of direct contact constitutes a violation of the constitution.

This incident is particularly concerning given the Tisza Party's recent electoral success. Magyar's broad call for the resignation of numerous public officeholders—including the heads of the Kúria, the Hungarian Competition Authority, the National Office of the Judiciary, the Constitutional Court, and the president—was made immediately following the election. While Magyar has since stated intentions to respect the rule of law in removing these officials, his initial public demand has already set a troubling precedent and drawn sharp criticism from legal scholars regarding its constitutionality.

“

According to the expert, it can be stated that Peter Magyar committed a constitutional violation even before taking office.