Maradona's ex-partner provides new evidence in trial: a recording of a key meeting

In the ongoing trial surrounding the death of football legend Diego Armando Maradona, a significant development has emerged with the presentation of a complete audio recording of a pivotal meeting. Verónica Ojeda, Maradona's former partner and mother of his youngest son, provided the full audio of a discussion where the modality of the football icon's medical treatment was decided. This recording is seen as a critical piece of evidence, potentially shedding light on the decisions made in the lead-up to Maradona's passing on November 25, 2020, while he was under home care.

The significance of Ojeda's contribution lies in its comparison to an audio recording presented during a previous, annulled trial. That earlier recording, lasting approximately one hour, was provided by Rodolfo Benvenuti, a doctor called to the meeting. Ojeda, however, revealed that her own recording of the same meeting spans one hour and 45 minutes. This discrepancy immediately raises serious questions about the integrity and completeness of the evidence previously considered, suggesting that the earlier audio might have been incomplete or even tampered with.

“

I also recorded the meeting. The problem is that the recordings do not match. The audio played in the first trial lasted an hour, but my recording lasts an hour and 45 minutes.

The prosecution and the victim's legal representatives promptly requested the incorporation of Ojeda's complete recording into the current trial. However, this move was met with opposition from the defense of Leopoldo Luque, Maradona's neurosurgeon and primary caregiver, who is a key accused in the case. Despite the objections, the tribunal has decided to admit Ojeda's audio into the expediente, recognizing its potential pertinence and necessity for clarifying the facts. The court president, Alberto Gaig, proposed a comparative analysis of both audio recordings during the next hearing, aiming to meticulously evaluate the integrity of the evidence. From our perspective at El Deber, this development underscores the complex and often contentious nature of legal proceedings involving high-profile figures, where the pursuit of truth requires careful scrutiny of all available evidence, especially when inconsistencies emerge.

“

We understand that it is pertinent and necessary to clarify the facts, to evaluate the integrity of the audio that was originally incorporated, about which it was said that it could contain cuts or edits.