MP proposes removing Kyrgyz language test from ORT

Member of Parliament Dastan Bekeshov is advocating for significant changes to Kyrgyzstan's educational assessment system, specifically targeting the national standardized entrance exam, known as ORT. His initiative focuses on removing the Kyrgyz language test, arguing that it places an undue burden on students, especially those in Russian, Tajik, and Uzbek-language schools.

“

In the position it is stated that if a child performs poorly on the exam, they will retake it or the pedagogical council may consider the issue of leaving them in the same grade. This is unacceptable.

Bekeshov points to a discrepancy between the constitution and a ministerial order, where the Kyrgyz language test is stipulated to not affect class progression, yet the subordinate act allows for retakes and even grade repetition based on its results. He contends that this creates unnecessary stress and pressure on young learners. The parliamentarian suggests an alternative approach: assessing Kyrgyz language proficiency without impacting academic standing or causing anxiety.

Furthermore, Bekeshov highlights the financial implications for parents, noting the 470 som cost of the ORT Kyrgyz language test this year. He argues that this test is redundant, as students already take a state language exam, leading to duplication and added stress for graduates. The proposal aims to streamline the ORT by removing this component, thereby alleviating pressure on students and parents alike.

“

This test does not affect anything, but it must be taken. Moreover, graduates already take the state exam in the Kyrgyz language. There is duplication and an unnecessary burden.

From a Kyrgyz perspective, this debate touches upon sensitive issues of national identity, language policy, and educational reform. While international observers might see this as a procedural adjustment, for Kyrgyzstan, it reflects ongoing efforts to balance the promotion of the state language with the needs of its diverse linguistic communities. Bekeshov's initiative, as reported by 24.kg, positions itself as a move to protect children's rights and reduce educational stress, framing the issue not as a political statement but as a practical improvement for the education system. The emphasis on reducing student and parental burdens resonates within a society often grappling with the practicalities of implementing language policies.

“

Bekeshov called on his colleagues to consider the initiative from the perspective of protecting children's rights, not political interests.