National Assembly Speaker Urges Opposition to Join Constitutional Amendment Drive

The Hankyoreh reports on National Assembly Speaker Woo Won-shik's strong appeal to the People Power Party to join the constitutional amendment process. Woo directly challenged the party, questioning their motives for opposing the amendment and even suggesting their leadership is beholden to a faction he termed "Yoon-again." This framing highlights a deep political divide and a sense of urgency from the perspective of those pushing for the amendment.

“

What is the real reason the People Power Party opposes constitutional amendment?

The article emphasizes the historical significance of this amendment, noting it's the first in 39 years. The proposed changes, particularly those strengthening parliamentary control over presidential emergency decrees, are presented as crucial for preventing future abuses of power, referencing past incidents like the 12.3 emergency decree. From a South Korean perspective, the debate over constitutional reform is not merely procedural but touches upon fundamental principles of democracy and the balance of power.

“

Some ask if the faction most opposed to constitutional amendment is 'Yoon-again,' and there are also points that the People Power Party leadership is tied to 'Yoon-again.'

The Hankyoreh, known for its progressive editorial stance, frames the People Power Party's opposition as a potential betrayal of the public will and a missed opportunity for the party to reform itself. The call for individual lawmakers to vote their conscience suggests a belief that the party leadership is obstructing a popular or necessary reform. The article implicitly argues that opposing these changes could alienate voters and hinder the party's own legitimacy, especially when compared to the broad support from other parties.

“

If you block the constitutional amendment until the end, which of you will deeply consider who will believe your sincerity in opposing the 12.3 emergency decree?

This story is particularly resonant in South Korea due to its history of authoritarian rule and the ongoing struggle to solidify democratic institutions. The specific inclusion of the 'Bu-ma Democratic Uprising' and the 'May 18 Democratization Movement' in the proposed amendment's preamble is a powerful acknowledgment of past struggles for democracy, a point that resonates deeply within the national consciousness and is often viewed differently by international observers who may not grasp the historical weight of these events.

“

If the constitutional amendment opportunity, which comes once in 39 years, is blocked by party policy and the amendment is nullified, the People Power Party must bear all responsibility.