‘No longer a trustworthy humanitarian organization’: NGO Monitor releases report on MSF’s failings

A critical report by NGO Monitor has leveled serious accusations against Doctors Without Borders (MSF), alleging a significant departure from its core principles of neutrality and impartiality in the context of the Gaza war. The Jerusalem Post highlights NGO Monitor's findings, which suggest that MSF has increasingly adopted a narrative that exclusively criticizes Israel while downplaying or ignoring the role of Hamas. This alleged bias, according to the report, has become particularly pronounced since the Hamas attacks of October 7, 2023.

“

MSF is no longer neutral; its humanitarian language now serves a political cause.

The report details how MSF has allegedly relied on figures provided by Hamas and has been slow to acknowledge the actions of the terror group, including the October 7 massacre. NGO Monitor points out that MSF took three days to acknowledge Hamas's attack, rocket fire, and hostage-taking, yet was quicker to publish unverified accusations against Israel. Furthermore, the report claims that MSF officials have regularly described Israeli actions as genocidal, despite the organization acknowledging it lacks the legal authority to establish intentionality for such claims. This selective reporting and amplification of accusations against Israel, while minimizing Hamas's culpability, forms the crux of NGO Monitor's critique.

“

MSF has abandoned its principles of neutrality and impartiality in its coverage of the Gaza war, relying on Hamas-provided figures while downplaying the group’s role.

The findings echo concerns previously raised by MSF's own former leadership. Alain Destexhe, the former Secretary General of MSF International, had warned that the organization was "no longer neutral" and that its "humanitarian language now serves a political cause." Destexhe's earlier report in December 2023 highlighted what he described as an "infatuation with Hamas" among MSF staff, with a significant percentage of statements allegedly praising the terror group and the October 7 massacre. Some staff members were even reported to have boasted of participation in Hamas's infrastructure projects.

“

Over 40% of statements by staff, including senior figures, praised the terror group and the October 7 massacre, and some boasted of participation in tunnel construction and weapons production.

From the perspective of NGO Monitor and its coverage in outlets like The Jerusalem Post, this report is crucial for holding humanitarian organizations accountable. The framing emphasizes the betrayal of humanitarian principles and the potential for such biased reporting to influence international opinion against Israel. The story is uniquely interesting from an Israeli viewpoint because it addresses the critical issue of how international organizations operating in conflict zones are perceived and whether they are upholding their stated missions or inadvertently or intentionally furthering political agendas. The report serves as a counter-narrative to what is often presented by international media and NGOs, highlighting alleged double standards and the need for scrutiny of humanitarian actors.

“

The pattern of pushing an 'increasingly narrow narrative that exclusively criticized Israel and erased Hamas' was apparent by 2015.