‘Not good enough’: Government Departments’ Testimony at Tai Po Fire Inquiry

The ongoing public inquiry into the devastating Tai Po fire has entered a critical phase, with multiple government departments facing scrutiny over their roles and responsibilities leading up to the tragedy. The testimony presented has painted a concerning picture of inter-departmental communication breakdowns and a perceived lack of urgency in addressing residents' safety concerns during a major renovation project at Wang Fuk Court.

“

During this inquiry, it appears that all government departments agree that things were not ideal. I have lost count of how many times we have heard, ‘Not good enough.’

High-ranking officials and frontline officers alike have conceded that the departments' responses were inadequate. Phrases like "not good enough" and "could have been done better" have been repeated throughout the hearings, underscoring a collective acknowledgment of systemic failures. The Fire Services Department, in particular, has had numerous witnesses testify, including its director, Andy Yeung. However, conflicting accounts have emerged regarding the extent of the department's purview, with some officers suggesting certain fire hazards fell outside their responsibility, a claim that has been met with skepticism.

“

Not good enough

Judge David Lok, the committee chair, has highlighted a significant "grey area" in the existing framework, indicating a lack of clear demarcation of responsibilities for fire hazard management, especially in the context of building renovations. This inquiry is not just about assigning blame but about identifying crucial gaps in oversight and communication to prevent future disasters. The testimony from departments including the Fire Services, Labour, Buildings, Home Affairs, and the Urban Renewal Authority is vital in understanding how such a tragedy could occur and what systemic changes are necessary to ensure public safety in Hong Kong.

“

grey area