Perhutani urges compliance with forest utilization agreements
Translated from Indonesian, summarized and contextualized by DistantNews.
At a glance
- Perhutani's West Java Deputy Head stressed the importance of complying with forest utilization cooperation agreements (PKS).
- He noted instances where forest area use exceeded agreed-upon boundaries, despite detailed contract discussions.
- Perhutani monitors forest use and addresses violations through a graduated process, prioritizing open communication and adherence to regulations.
Komarudin, Deputy Head of the West Java Regional Division of Perhutani, has underscored the critical need for strict adherence to cooperation agreements (PKS) governing the utilization of forest areas. Speaking at a hearing with Commission II of the West Java Regional People's Representative Council, alongside representatives from Palawi and Koperasi Binamitra, Komarudin highlighted that these agreements are meticulously discussed and legally binding.
He explained that before any PKS is finalized, both parties undergo a detailed discussion of each clause, ensuring a clear understanding of their respective rights and obligations. Komarudin pointed out that Perhutani has observed cases where the actual utilization of forest areas has expanded beyond the 5.5 hectares specified in the agreements, despite the parties having legally signed and acknowledged the PKS terms. This deviation from the agreed-upon boundaries is a significant concern.
Perhutani employs a robust monitoring mechanism, including daily, weekly, and monthly oversight, to ensure that forest area utilization aligns with established regulations. However, Komarudin acknowledged that limited personnel resources sometimes restrict constant on-site presence. When violations are detected, Perhutani follows a structured approach, starting with warnings and discussions before escalating to formal summonses or seeking mutual agreements, rather than immediately resorting to legal action.
Komarudin also commented on the thriving commercial activities within forest areas, citing examples of popular tenants and cafes in the Tangkuban Perahu-Cikole region. He expressed concern that revenue generated from these activities, which should ideally contribute to state income through Perhutani, might not be adequately shared. He noted that current profit-sharing schemes often allocate a larger percentage, between 75% and 85%, to partners, with Perhutani receiving a smaller portion. He urged for transparency and adherence to the agreed-upon rules, suggesting that a fair distribution is possible if all parties operate within the established framework.
Originally published by Republika in Indonesian. Translated, summarized, and contextualized by our editorial team with added local perspective. Read our editorial standards.