DistantNews
Support us
PLA scientists propose a plan to destroy US carrier groups from 3,000km away
๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ China /Conflict & Security

PLA scientists propose a plan to destroy US carrier groups from 3,000km away

From South China Morning Post · () English

Summarized and contextualized by DistantNews.

At a glance

News Named sources New plan
  • Chinese defense scientists have proposed a method to destroy US carrier groups from 3,000 km away.
  • The plan, detailed in a peer-reviewed journal, outlines how to counter US naval assets from a significant distance.
  • This research addresses the challenge of engaging dispersed US military assets in modern warfare.

Chinese defense scientists have developed a detailed plan to destroy US carrier groups from 3,000 kilometers away, a distance that places US assets like Guam beyond the reach of most conventional missiles. The research, published in the journal Tactical Missile Technology by a team from the National University of Defence Technology in Nanjing, offers a step-by-step guide for engaging enemy carrier groups. Led by associate professor Gao Tianyun, the paper is titled โ€œResearch on the effectiveness of anti-ship missile swarm operation under distributed confrontation.โ€

For years, the US Navy has operated its large ships close to China, making them vulnerable to China's anti-access/area-denial weapons. These include mid-range ballistic missiles, hypersonic gliders, and cruise missile swarms. The new research suggests a strategy to counter US naval power even when its assets are dispersed and at a greater distance, such as in Guam, which is approximately 3,000 km from Shanghai. This approach highlights China's ongoing efforts to develop capabilities that can challenge US military dominance in the region.

Research on the effectiveness of antiโ€‘ship missile swarm operation under distributed confrontation

โ€” Gao TianyunThe title of the paper published in Tactical Missile Technology.
DistantNews Editorial

Originally published by South China Morning Post. Summarized and contextualized by our editorial team with added local perspective. Read our editorial standards.