DistantNews
Support us
Poland's Constitutional Tribunal Chief: Appointed Judges Are Not Judges

Poland's Constitutional Tribunal Chief: Appointed Judges Are Not Judges

From Rzeczpospolita · () Polish

Translated from Polish, summarized and contextualized by DistantNews.

At a glance

News Named sources Under investigation
  • Poland's Constitutional Tribunal President Bogdan Święczkowski responded to the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) regarding judges appointed by the Sejm.
  • The ECHR had ordered Poland to cease obstructing judges selected by the Sejm from assuming their duties.
  • Święczkowski stated that the individuals in question are not judges because they did not establish a legal employment relationship with the court.

Bogdan Święczkowski, president of Poland's Constitutional Tribunal, has responded to the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) concerning judges appointed by the Sejm earlier this year. The ECHR had issued a provisional measure ordering Poland to stop hindering the judges, who were selected by the Sejm in March, from taking up their positions.

The applicants have taken their oaths and are judges.

— Polish government (as cited by Święczkowski)Święczkowski cited media reports to the ECHR, indicating the government's position on the status of the appointed judges.

This ECHR decision stemmed from a case filed by four judges who were prevented from serving. They were given until early June to submit a formal complaint to the European court. Święczkowski's letter, dated May 28, directly addresses the ECHR's "interim order" in the case of Dziurda and others v. Poland.

I am forced to submit the following information.

— Bogdan ŚwięczkowskiŚwięczkowski's opening statement in his letter to the ECHR, indicating his intention to clarify the situation.

In his correspondence, Święczkowski cited media reports suggesting the Polish government informed the ECHR that the applicants had taken their oaths and were indeed judges. However, he asserted that the Constitutional Tribunal is not obstructing anyone's duties, as, in his view, these individuals are not judges. He explained that their inability to assume their roles is a consequence of failing to establish a legal employment relationship as judges, despite being among the six individuals elected by the Sejm in March.

the applicants are not judges.

— Bogdan ŚwięczkowskiŚwięczkowski's core argument explaining why the Constitutional Tribunal is not obstructing their duties.
DistantNews Editorial

Originally published by Rzeczpospolita in Polish. Translated, summarized, and contextualized by our editorial team with added local perspective. Read our editorial standards.