President Lee: Opposing constitutional amendment means supporting illegal martial law

President Lee Jae-myung has issued a strong call to action regarding the constitutional amendment bill, framing opposition to it as tacit support for illegal martial law. Speaking at a joint State Council and emergency economic inspection meeting, the President stressed the urgency of passing the amendment, which is slated for a parliamentary vote tomorrow. His remarks, as reported by Hankyoreh, aim to rally support and overcome potential obstacles, particularly from the People Power Party, whose votes are critical for the bill's passage.

The President articulated a vision for a modernized South Korea, arguing that the current constitution, established in 1987, no longer adequately reflects the nation's significant political, economic, and social advancements. He emphasized that the proposed amendments are essential for ensuring the country's democratic future and the well-being of its citizens. The inclusion of provisions to prevent the abuse of martial law, a sensitive issue in South Korea's history, is presented as a fundamental step towards strengthening democratic safeguards.

“

Those who oppose it are proponents of illegal martial law.

Lee's rhetoric is particularly pointed, directly challenging those who might oppose the amendment. By stating that anyone against preventing illegal martial law is essentially a proponent of it, he seeks to put opponents on the defensive and highlight the perceived absurdity of resisting such a measure. This strong stance is likely intended to pressure lawmakers, especially within the conservative People Power Party, to align with the amendment, which also seeks to incorporate the democratic spirit of the May 18th Gwangju Uprising and the Busan-Masan Uprising into the constitution's preamble.

The upcoming vote is critical, requiring a two-thirds majority in the National Assembly. With one independent lawmaker currently imprisoned and unable to vote, the ruling party needs at least 12 votes from the People Power Party to secure passage. The President's impassioned appeal underscores the high stakes involved and the deep historical significance attached to this constitutional revision, which aims to solidify democratic principles and prevent future authoritarian overreach.

“

We should put the spirit of the May 18th Gwangju Uprising and the spirit of the Busan-Masan Uprising into the preamble of the Constitution. Who opposes strengthening local autonomy?