SDP Leader: Croatia's Development Model is Wrong, EU Funds Misused

The Social Democratic Party of Croatia (SDP) is sounding the alarm on the nation's economic trajectory, with party president Siniša Hajdaš Dončić delivering a scathing critique of the current development model. Speaking in Zabok, Hajdaš Dončić asserted that Croatia's approach to development is fundamentally flawed and that billions of euros from European Union funds have been misallocated, failing to yield meaningful progress for the country.

“

The development model of Croatia is wrong, it is bad. Billions and billions of European funds are directed incorrectly. There is usability, there are certain results on the ground, but they have not contributed to the development of the Republic of Croatia.

According to Hajdaš Dončić, the ruling party, led by Prime Minister Andrej Plenković, lacks the resolve for the deep reforms necessary to steer Croatia toward genuine growth. Instead, the government is merely engaging in superficial adjustments that do not address the core issues plaguing the nation. The SDP leader also highlighted a recent political setback for Plenković, noting that the opposition successfully argued against the government's proposed candidates for the Supreme Court president and constitutional judges, a victory Hajdaš Dončić attributed to the SDP's effective use of arguments and facts.

“

Prime Minister Andrej Plenković has no strength for reforms, only for 'fine-tuning things that are not good in Croatia'.

Looking ahead, Hajdaš Dončić expressed optimism about the SDP's prospects in the upcoming parliamentary elections, particularly in collaboration with the Možemo! platform. He believes a joint victory would pave the way for positive change, enabling Croatia to become a more effective and better place to live. This sentiment underscores the SDP's commitment to offering a distinct alternative to the current government's policies, emphasizing a vision for a stronger, more prosperous Croatia.

“

He suffered a defeat from us, because we refuted his thesis with arguments, evidence, and facts that the election of the Supreme Court, i.e. the president of the Supreme Court and constitutional judges, is a unique process.