SK Chairman Urges Lawmakers for Field Experience; MP Questions Assessment

A recent exchange between SK Group Chairman Chey Tae-won and National Assembly member Choi Min-hee has highlighted a perceived gap between the business world's practical needs and the legislative process. During a policy seminar, Chey advised lawmakers to venture out and experience the 'field'—the actual industrial landscape—to truly grasp the complexities of the issues they legislate. He stressed that understanding the 'player's' perspective is crucial for effective policymaking, suggesting that a purely legislative viewpoint can lead to overly restrictive regulations.

“

You need to go to the field together. You need to see it more as a player on the field.

Rep. Choi Min-hee, however, countered Chey's remarks, implying that the chairman might underestimate the level of preparation and understanding among National Assembly members, particularly concerning rapidly evolving fields like artificial intelligence (AI). She pointed out the significant number of AI-related discussions that have already taken place, suggesting that the issue isn't a lack of awareness but perhaps a difference in perspective on how to best address the challenges posed by capital and technology.

“

Chairman Chey seems to not know the preparedness of the National Assembly members well.

Chey's core message revolved around the need for clearer demarcation between matters best handled by legislation and those that could be addressed through industry self-regulation. He argued that an overabundance of laws can stifle innovation and activity. Furthermore, he reiterated his call for legislators to engage more directly with global industry trends and players, believing that such direct exposure is essential for informed decision-making. This dialogue underscores the ongoing tension between corporate demands for regulatory flexibility and the legislative branch's responsibility to govern and protect public interest.

“

When making laws, there should be a distinction between whether it is a matter to be resolved by law or whether it should be left to autonomy.