South Korea Demands Dismissal of Conscientious Objector, Citing Outdated Law

The recent actions by the Military Manpower Administration (MMA) against a conscientious objector, activist 'Dubu' (Kim Min-hyeong), represent a disturbing regression into authoritarian practices. The MMA's demand for the Han-Vietnam Peace Foundation to dismiss Dubu, based on a 1973 law, is a clear indication of how outdated and oppressive state mechanisms continue to stifle individual freedoms in South Korea. Dubu's declaration of complete conscientious objection, refusing even the alternative service, stems from a principled stance against a militaristic system that infringes upon freedom of conscience.

“

The Military Manpower Administration demanded that our activist be fired. Activist Dubu (Kim Min-hyeong) declared complete conscientious objection at a press conference in front of the National Assembly in February.

The justification provided by the MMA, invoking Article 76 of the Military Service Act – a relic from the Park Chung-hee dictatorship – is particularly egregious. This law, designed to coerce military service through economic pressure, is being wielded against an individual who is still undergoing legal proceedings. The MMA's preemptive labeling of Dubu as a 'military offender' and its demand for dismissal, before any judicial ruling, flagrantly disregards the principle of presumed innocence. This heavy-handed approach not only threatens Dubu's livelihood but also reflects a systemic disregard for evolving societal values and human rights standards.

“

The demand for dismissal, based on a law from the Park Chung-hee dictatorship era, is a relic of an oppressive era when the state used the threat of economic ruin to enforce service.

This incident underscores a critical disconnect between South Korea's legal framework and its international commitments to human rights. The National Human Rights Commission has previously recommended amendments to Article 76, recognizing its punitive nature and conflict with constitutional principles. Yet, the government's continued reliance on such archaic legislation highlights a resistance to reform. The article emphasizes that instead of punishing and excluding conscientious objectors, South Korea should embrace a system that guarantees their rights and provides genuine alternatives, aligning with global trends towards peace and non-violence. Dubu's courageous stand, supported by figures like Archbishop Kang Woo-il, is presented as a vital catalyst for demanding such necessary changes.

“

This measure is clearly excessive. Dubu has publicly stated their choice and reasons, and is cooperating with the investigation process. It is unjust for an administrative agency to impose sanctions preemptively before a court ruling.