Speaker Woo Weeps as Constitutional Amendment Bill Fails Amidst PPP Filibuster
Translated from Korean, summarized and contextualized by DistantNews.
TLDR
- National Assembly Speaker Woo Won-shik expressed deep disappointment and shed tears after a constitutional amendment bill failed to pass due to opposition from the People Power Party.
- The PPP accused the Democratic Party of attempting to force the amendment without consensus and using it to gain an advantage in upcoming local elections, while also criticizing the inclusion of historical events in the preamble.
- The article criticizes the PPP's filibuster tactics as an attempt to paralyze the National Assembly and highlights the missed opportunities for constitutional reform, attributing some blame to both the Speaker and the President for failing to secure sufficient support.
As the Speaker of the National Assembly, I am heartbroken and deeply saddened by the failure to advance the constitutional amendment, a crucial step towards restoring our democracy and political integrity. The People Power Party's obstruction, particularly their use of filibusters on not only the amendment but also on 50 other vital bills, is a blatant attempt to paralyze the legislative body and disregard the upcoming local elections. Their insistence on linking constitutional reform to unrelated historical events and their continued association with figures who have faced accusations of illegal martial law only serve to undermine the very principles of democracy we aim to uphold.
The People Power Party has not only kicked away the constitutional amendment opportunity that was barely created but has also kicked away the responsibility to fulfill the promises made to the people as a political party.
This is not merely a political setback; it is a betrayal of the public trust and a missed opportunity to strengthen our nation's foundational law. The People Power Party's arguments, particularly those echoing the sentiments of 'Yoon Again' far-right groups, reveal a troubling agenda that seeks to whitewash historical injustices and defend authoritarianism. Their focus on the achievements of past dictators while opposing the inclusion of pivotal democratic movements like the May 18th Democratization Movement in the constitution is a clear indicator of their regressive stance.
Where have all the words about reflecting on and opposing illegal martial law gone? While filibustering a constitutional amendment that would prevent even dreaming of illegal martial law, do they think they can escape the public's suspicion and criticism that they have not severed ties with former President Yoon Suk-yeol, who was sentenced by the court as the ringleader of rebellion?
While the opposition's tactics are deplorable, we must also acknowledge the challenges in securing the necessary two-thirds majority. The President's attempts to garner support, though well-intentioned, were met with resistance, particularly concerning the issue of presidential term limits. The path to constitutional reform is arduous, requiring broad consensus and a genuine commitment to democratic principles from all parties. We must find a way to bridge these divides and ensure that the voices of the people, who yearn for a more robust and just democracy, are heard and acted upon.
Is the constitution, which is kept when liked and broken when not liked, a plaything of the Democratic Party? Did you have the will to amend the constitution? Perhaps you needed a record of the People Power Party opposing it while pushing for the constitutional amendment without bipartisan agreement. Wasn't there an intention to gain an advantageous position in the local elections by imposing the nasty frame of being a party that condones martial law?
Originally published by Hankyoreh in Korean. Translated, summarized, and contextualized by our editorial team with added local perspective. Read our editorial standards.