Speech-Impaired Applicant Sues SNU Law School Over Lack of Interview Accommodations

In a move that underscores the ongoing struggle for equal access in higher education, an applicant with a mild speech impediment has taken Seoul National University's prestigious Law School to court. The lawsuit, filed alongside disability rights organizations, alleges a fundamental failure by the university to provide 'reasonable accommodations' during the crucial admissions interview process. This is not merely an administrative oversight; it is a direct challenge to the spirit and letter of South Korea's Disability Discrimination Act, which mandates equitable treatment for individuals with disabilities.

“

This is not a trivial administrative mistake. It is a clear act of discrimination that explicitly violates the obligation to provide reasonable accommodations under the Disability Discrimination Act.

The applicant, identified only as 'A', reportedly passed the initial screening for the 2026 admissions cycle but faced significant hurdles during the interview stage. Despite inquiring about potential accommodations like extended time or the option for written responses due to their stuttering, 'A' was informed that such provisions were difficult to provide for a 'mild' disability. This response, critics argue, directly contradicts the law's intent, which aims to level the playing field, not create additional barriers. The fact that 'A' successfully gained admission to another law school with similar accommodations further highlights the perceived inadequacy of SNU's process.

“

Seoul National University is an institution established for higher education, and the Law School, in particular, is an institution that cultivates legal professionals. Despite this, they have violated the law themselves. There is no provision in the law that exempts the provision of accommodations for people with mild disabilities.

This case, supported by groups like the Disability Rights Advancement and Promotion Center and the Public Interest Law Foundation 'Hope for Law', brings to light a systemic issue that may extend beyond SNU's Law School. Advocates are now calling for a comprehensive review of admission procedures across all law schools nationwide, seeking to ensure that 'reasonable accommodations' are not just a legal formality but a practical reality. The lawsuit serves as a critical reminder that true inclusivity in education requires proactive measures and a genuine commitment to dismantling barriers, ensuring that all aspiring legal professionals, regardless of their disability, have a fair chance to demonstrate their capabilities.

“

We do not believe this is an issue solely with SNU Law School. We are currently investigating whether reasonable accommodations are being properly provided in law schools nationwide and whether such guidelines or standards exist, with the aim of achieving proper institutional improvement through this lawsuit.