DistantNews
Support us
Supreme Court Rejects Consumer Law Claim for Blocked BISP Retailer ID
๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ฐ Pakistan /Crime & Justice

Supreme Court Rejects Consumer Law Claim for Blocked BISP Retailer ID

From Dawn · () English

Translated from English, summarized and contextualized by DistantNews.

At a glance

News Named sources Outcome reported
  • The Supreme Court ruled that a complaint by a BISP retailer ID holder was not maintainable under consumer protection laws.
  • The court found the relationship between the retailer and BISP did not constitute a "consumer service" arrangement.
  • However, the court directed BISP to investigate the ID deactivation and provide the complainant a hearing.

The Supreme Court has set aside lower court orders that aimed to restore the blocked identification of a retailer for the Benazir Income Support Programme (BISP). The apex court determined that a complaint filed by a Point-of-Sale (PoS) agent against BISP over his deactivated ID was not valid under consumer protection laws.

A two-judge bench, led by Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, ruled that the relationship between the PoS agent and BISP did not qualify as a "consumer service" arrangement. Consequently, the complaint filed under the Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Consumer Protection Act of 1997 was deemed not maintainable. This decision overturns previous rulings by the Consumer Protection Court in Bannu and the Peshawar High Court, which had ordered BISP and Bank Alfalah to reinstate the agent's ID.

Despite dismissing the maintainability of the consumer protection claim, the Supreme Court, in the interest of justice, has mandated an inquiry. The BISP director general for cash transfers in Islamabad is directed to investigate the deactivation of the complainant's ID. The complainant, Fardayaz Khan, must be given a full opportunity to explain the reasons for his ID being blocked and to be confronted with any complaints lodged against him by the BISP Directorate.

An appropriate order is to be passed within 45 days following this inquiry, allowing Khan to pursue further legal remedies if necessary. The case originated when Khan, who claimed to be a PoS retailer distributing BISP payments under a franchise agreement, had his ID deactivated by Bank Alfalah in May 2021. His subsequent legal challenges, initially dismissed by the Wafaqi Mohtasib, eventually led to the Consumer Protection Court's directive for ID restoration.

We held that [the] complaint under Section 13 of the Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Consumer Protection Act of 1997 was not maintainable.

โ€” Justice Muhammad Ali MazharExplaining the Supreme Court's decision to set aside lower court orders regarding the retailer's ID.
DistantNews Editorial

Originally published by Dawn in English. Translated, summarized, and contextualized by our editorial team with added local perspective. Read our editorial standards.