DistantNews
Support us
Suvatne gives himself a 4.5/6 in "Debatten" debut: – Went off the rails sometimes

Suvatne gives himself a 4.5/6 in "Debatten" debut: – Went off the rails sometimes

From Aftenposten · () Norwegian

Translated from Norwegian, summarized and contextualized by DistantNews.

At a glance

News Sources not specified Context piece
  • Steinar Suvatne rated his debut as host of "Debatten" between 4 and 4.5 out of 6, acknowledging he "went off the rails" at times.
  • The program focused on freedom of speech, featuring debates on online hate speech and the controversial Fritt Ord award given to the rap duo Karpe.
  • Suvatne aimed for a good temperature and pressure, believing they hit the right topics and captured the spirit of the times.

Steinar Suvatne has completed his first broadcast as the host of "Debatten," Norway's prominent debate program. Reflecting on his performance, Suvatne rated himself between a 4 and 4.5 out of 6, admitting that he "went off the rails" occasionally but felt the overall broadcast had good energy and focus.

The temperature, I think, was good, there was good pressure here. I think we hit the topics and the spirit of the times well.

— Steinar SuvatneDescribing his debut as host of "Debatten."

The inaugural episode delved into the complex issue of freedom of speech. It featured a heated exchange between AUF leader Gaute Skjervø and Document.no editor Hans Rustad concerning online hate speech and the moderation of comment sections. Skjervø criticized Rustad's platform for failing to adequately address hateful content, while Rustad acknowledged the difficulty in removing all offensive material due to capacity constraints.

It is completely unrealistic with a six out of six in the first broadcast.

— Steinar SuvatneCommenting on his self-assessment of his hosting performance.

Further discussion revolved around the controversial decision to award the Fritt Ord prize to the rap duo Karpe. Fritt Ord board chairman Bård Vegar Solhjell defended the choice, emphasizing the importance of supporting provocative voices. However, commentator Elin Ørjasæther questioned this logic, suggesting that if provocation is the sole criterion, then hateful comments from social media should also be recognized.

I earnestly ask Norwegian editors, including those on the right, to take responsibility for it, and I experience getting an incredibly passive attitude back.

— Gaute SkjervøAddressing Norwegian editors regarding the handling of online hate speech.

To navigate the boundaries of legal and illegal speech, the program also presented examples, including one constructed by the "Debatten" editorial team, referencing expert opinions from freedom of speech specialist and law professor Anine Kierulf. Suvatne expressed a desire to maintain a calm demeanor, even using the band Oasis as a mental anchor during the broadcast.

This is sewage.

— Hans RustadResponding to hateful comments from Document.no's Facebook page.
DistantNews Editorial

Originally published by Aftenposten in Norwegian. Translated, summarized, and contextualized by our editorial team with added local perspective. Read our editorial standards.