THE LABOUR PARTY CONUNDRUM
Summarized and contextualized by DistantNews.
At a glance
- The Labour Party (LP) faces a critical juncture as the Supreme Court is urged to resolve its internal crisis before the 2027 general election campaign begins.
- The article argues that lower courts overstepped by intervening in the party's internal affairs, potentially undermining the rule of law and party autonomy.
- Millions of Nigerians joined the LP believing it was their party, and the author expresses concern that court orders and elite bargains could disenfranchise them.
As Nigeria gears up for the 2027 general elections, the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) has released the official campaign timetable, signaling the start of public campaigns. This development underscores the urgent need for the Supreme Court to swiftly resolve the ongoing judicial crisis within the Labour Party (LP). The author contends that lower courts have overstepped their bounds by delving into the LP's internal matters, a move that could set a dangerous precedent.
Millions of ordinary Nigerians, including workers, artisans, traders, and students, embraced the Labour Party movement, viewing it as their own and actively promoting and protecting it during elections. This widespread grassroots support makes the current situation particularly painful, as court orders and alleged elite bargains threaten to undermine the party's ownership by its members. The core issue at stake is whether the Nigerian courts will uphold the rule of law or permit the judicial hijacking of political parties.
We will not be used to hijack a party.
The article references a Supreme Court verdict from April 4, 2025, which stated, โWe will not be used to hijack a party.โ This ruling emphasized three key points that lower courts appear to have overlooked: protecting jurisdiction, affirming that party membership and leadership are internal matters, and preserving the status quo ante by not declaring any specific leadership or dissolving the National Executive Committee (NEC). The Supreme Court's stance was to direct parties to resolve disputes according to their own constitutions.
Four legal pillars are highlighted as demanding the Supreme Court's attention. Firstly, jurisdiction was allegedly breached when the Federal High Court issued an order for INEC to recognize a specific faction of the LP. This directive is seen as moving beyond adjudication into administration, potentially enabling any member to seek court intervention for installing party leadership. Such actions, the author argues, constitute judicial endorsement and hijacking, rather than the upholding of the rule of law. Section 6 of the Nigerian Constitution vests judicial power in interpreting laws, not running political parties, and Section 82(1) of the Electoral Act 2022 places leadership succession within party constitutions.
This house has its own landlord. Go settle it there first.
Originally published by ThisDay. Summarized and contextualized by our editorial team with added local perspective. Read our editorial standards.