DistantNews
Support us
The world adrift
๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ฐ Pakistan /Conflict & Security

The world adrift

From Dawn · () English

Summarized and contextualized by DistantNews.

At a glance

Analysis Sources not specified Context piece
  • The world faces significant geopolitical upheaval and instability, marking a departure from the post-Cold War order.
  • Rising geopolitical tensions and geoeconomic competition are fragmenting the international system, with a disregard for international law.
  • Scholarly works analyze the current global disarray and the potential emergence of a multipolar era, with the Global South expected to play a key role.

The world is navigating a period of profound geopolitical upheaval and instability, unlike any seen since the end of the Cold War. Rising tensions and fierce geoeconomic competition are dismantling the old international order, characterized by rules and multilateralism. The system is fragmenting, leaving nations to contend with a "rule-less terrain" amid volatility.

The old order with its rules has gone. The international system is fragmenting. Multilateralism remains under unprecedented stress. Power shifts continue to reshape the international landscape, marking the advent of a multipolar era.

โ€” N/ADescribing the current state of global affairs and the shift away from the post-Cold War order.

Hard power has re-emerged as a primary tool for powerful nations seeking to influence others, often preceding diplomatic efforts. Recent military actions by the US and Israel against Iran, Russia's invasion of Ukraine, Israel's war on Gaza, Lebanon, and Syria, and India's actions against Pakistan are cited as examples of force being used with impunity, further eroding the global order.

Several recent books explore this era of transition and disarray. Alexander Stubb's "The Triangle of Power: Rebalancing the New World Order" argues that the liberal world order has collapsed and trust is broken. He posits that the future will be shaped by the interplay between the Global West, Global East, and the Global South, with the latter seeking greater representation and power redistribution.

Hard power is back, and with a vengeance. Not that it ever went away. But now itโ€™s the first option, not the last for powerful countries to use to bend other states to their will. Diplomacy only happens after missiles fly.

โ€” N/ACharacterizing the increased reliance on military force in international relations.

Stubb advocates for "cooperative multilateralism" and a "Helsinki" approach over "Yalta," suggesting that powerful states must accommodate the interests of the Global South and middle powers. Brendan Simms's "The Return of the Great Powers" focuses on the resurgence of traditional geopolitics and great power competition, while Jack Watling's "Statecraft: The New Rules of Power in a Divided World" examines contemporary power dynamics.

The liberal world order is in tatters, he argues, and trust that has been the basis of the international system, is broken. What happens next will depend on the interplay between the triangle of the Global West (US and Western allies), Global East (Russia, China) and Global South (the global majority).

โ€” Alexander StubbAs presented in the article, analyzing the breakdown of the liberal world order and the emerging power dynamics.

These analyses collectively paint a picture of a chaotic future, where the Global South is poised to play a significant role in rebalancing and shaping a new international order. The emphasis is on navigating a divided world and finding new frameworks for international cooperation in the absence of established norms.

He calls for cooperative multilateralism and choosing โ€˜Helsinkiโ€™ over โ€˜Yaltaโ€™. This means accommodating the views and interests of the Global South and economically empowered middle powers by more powerful states.

โ€” Alexander StubbDescribing Stubb's proposed approach to a new international order.
DistantNews Editorial

Originally published by Dawn. Summarized and contextualized by our editorial team with added local perspective. Read our editorial standards.