Uganda: Parliament Committee Clashes Over Sovereignty Bill Amendments

A heated debate unfolded in Uganda's parliamentary committee as MPs scrutinized the Protection of Sovereignty Bill, a piece of legislation aimed at regulating foreign influence within the nation. The joint committee, chaired by Baka Mugabi, found itself in a significant disagreement with representatives from the Ministry of Internal Affairs and the Attorney General's office regarding proposed amendments. The core of the contention lies in the bill's scope and the potential for its provisions to be broadly interpreted, raising concerns among lawmakers about its impact on legitimate political discourse and economic activity.

“

You have stated that the sponsor has amendments to consider but wouldn't it be procedurally right after the amendments that we reopen the consultation of the stakeholders to submit again on the revision.

Member of Parliament Asuman Basalirwa voiced strong objections, particularly questioning the absence of the bill's primary sponsor, Minister Kahinda Otafiire, and challenging the procedural fairness of introducing substantial amendments without reopening consultations with stakeholders. Basalirwa argued that significant revisions necessitate a fresh round of public input to ensure all voices are heard and potential ramifications are thoroughly examined. This procedural point highlights a fundamental tension between the government's desire to expedite legislation and the parliamentary duty to ensure thorough deliberation and public participation.

“

The bill was not intended to discourage foreign funding but to regulate its use where it influences prohibited political or economic activities.

While Minister of State for Internal Affairs David Muhoozi asserted that the amendments were designed to protect Uganda's autonomy and address concerns about foreign interference in policy-making, MPs remained skeptical. They pointed to the vagueness of terms such as 'foreign interest' and 'economic sabotage,' fearing these could be weaponized to stifle dissent or control legitimate political activities. The committee's deliberations underscore the delicate balance Uganda seeks to strike between safeguarding its sovereignty and fostering an environment conducive to foreign investment and international cooperation. The differing perspectives within the committee reflect the broader national conversation about national identity, external influence, and the future direction of Ugandan policy.

“

Terms such as 'foreign interest,' 'economic sabotage,' and 'political activity' remained vague and open to interpretation.