Venice Biennale Plagued by War and Controversy Ahead of Opening
Translated from Korean, summarized and contextualized by DistantNews.
TLDR
- The 61st Venice Biennale is embroiled in unprecedented political controversy ahead of its opening due to the participation of Russia and Israel, countries facing international condemnation for ongoing wars.
- International jurors resigned in protest, proposing to exclude nations whose leaders are indicted for war crimes, leading to the postponement of the awards ceremony and a shift to audience voting.
- The Biennale Foundation's decision to allow Russia and Israel to participate after they were excluded in 2024 has drawn criticism from Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni and the EU, highlighting a conflict between artistic openness and ethical considerations.
The Venice Biennale, a global stage for artistic expression, finds itself at the center of a storm, not for its art, but for the political tensions it has become entangled with. The decision to allow Russia and Israel, nations currently embroiled in devastating conflicts and facing widespread international condemnation, to participate in the national pavilions has ignited a firestorm of protest.
We must find an oasis, an island where the dignity of all living beings is protected, rejecting the 'spectacle of horror.'
This controversy cuts to the core of the Biennale's identity. For decades, it has served as a platform for progressive voices, a space to challenge authoritarianism and injustice, as seen in its past solidarity with Chile against the Pinochet regime. The current leadership's stance, however, appears to contradict this legacy. By welcoming nations accused of war crimes and allowing their participation, the Biennale risks being perceived as complicit, or at least indifferent, to the suffering caused by these conflicts.
The government does not agree with this decision.
The international jury's resignation and the subsequent shift to audience voting represent a significant disruption, underscoring the depth of the ethical concerns. While the Biennale champions an open structure, refusing exclusion or censorship, this principle seems to be selectively applied. The situation forces a difficult conversation: where does artistic freedom end and ethical responsibility begin, especially when the world is watching and grappling with ongoing atrocities?
The return of Russia is morally wrong.
Originally published by Hankyoreh in Korean. Translated, summarized, and contextualized by our editorial team with added local perspective. Read our editorial standards.