Anti-Tinubu Post: You’ve a Case to Answer, Court Tells Sowore

In a significant development in the ongoing legal battle, Nigerian activist Omoyele Sowore has been ordered by the Federal High Court in Abuja to present his defense against a two-count cybercrime charge. The charge, filed by the Department of State Services (DSS), stems from a social media post in which Sowore allegedly referred to President Bola Tinubu as a "criminal." Justice Mohammed Umar, presiding over the case, ruled that the DSS had successfully presented a prima facie case, meaning there is sufficient evidence to warrant Sowore opening his defense. This ruling dismisses Sowore's earlier attempt to have the case discharged and acquitted based on a "no-case submission." Sowore's legal team had argued that the prosecution failed to provide credible evidence linking him to the alleged offense and that crucial witnesses were not called. However, the DSS, represented by Mr. Akinlolu Kehinde, SAN, persuaded the court otherwise. The judge has now fixed May 19 for the defense to commence. Sowore's legal team expressed dissatisfaction and orally requested the judge's recusal, citing a lack of confidence in his ability to preside objectively. Justice Umar directed them to file a formal application for this request. Sowore was arraigned on December 2, 2025, on charges under the Cybercrimes (Prohibition, Prevention, Etc.) (Amendment) Act, 2024. The prosecution contends that the posts, made in response to President Tinubu's claims about ending corruption, were intended to cause a breakdown of law and order and tarnish the president's reputation. The case highlights the increasing scrutiny and legal challenges faced by activists and critics of the government in Nigeria, particularly concerning online speech and its potential impact on public order and reputation.

“

This criminal @officialABAT actually went to Brazil to state that there is NO MORE corruption under his regime in Nigeria. What audacity to lie shamelessly!