Bishop criticizes protest vulgarity: 'In Soviet times, there were no such things'
Translated from Lithuanian, summarized and contextualized by DistantNews.
TLDR
- Bishop Juozas Kauneckas criticizes the vulgarity and offensive language used in recent protests, comparing them unfavorably to the Soviet era.
- He notes that the protest language and imagery in Vilnius resemble those seen in Western European cities like Paris and London.
- The bishop expresses dismay at the disrespect shown towards the elected president, contrasting it with the perceived restraint during Soviet times.
Emeritus Bishop Juozas Kauneckas has voiced strong criticism regarding the nature of public protests, particularly lamenting the perceived decline in civility and decorum. He observes that current demonstrations are marred by "criminal elements" who "simply rage at rallies," using "indecent expressions and indecent drawings" on placards. Bishop Kauneckas contrasts this sharply with the Soviet era, stating such displays were absent then, but are now commonplace.
This is how criminal elements simply rage at rallies.
He points out that the language, gestures, and graphic content on protest signs in Vilnius are disturbingly similar to those witnessed in major Western European capitals such as Paris, London, and Rome. The bishop expresses particular dismay that protesters are "mocking even our elected president" with their offensive language. This sentiment reflects a concern often heard in Lithuania and other post-Soviet states, where there's a lingering sensitivity to perceived external influences and a desire to maintain national dignity and respect for institutions.
There are many indecent expressions and indecent drawings on the posters.
While Bishop Kauneckas's observations highlight a generational and perhaps cultural perspective on protest, it's worth noting how such displays are viewed internationally. In France or the UK, for instance, the police often tolerate a wider range of expression, even harsh criticism directed at leaders. The bishop's comparison to Western protests, like the chants against French President Emmanuel Macron or the "kid starver" placards targeting UK leader Keir Starmer, underscores a difference in how public dissent is managed and perceived. From a Lithuanian perspective, the bishop's commentary suggests a yearning for a more respectful public discourse, perhaps rooted in a historical context where public criticism of leadership was severely suppressed, leading to a strong reaction against perceived excessive or vulgar displays today.
In Soviet times, there were no such things. But now there are.
Originally published by Delfi in Lithuanian. Translated, summarized, and contextualized by our editorial team with added local perspective. Read our editorial standards.